Search for: "MARKS v. UNITED"
Results 121 - 140
of 10,990
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2024, 1:04 pm
This is the same mistake that the initial Fifth Circuit panel made in United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2024, 3:06 am
For example, Michael Waldman, president of New York University’s Brennan Center for Justice, noted that in 1974 the Court considered United States v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm
Konin and Mark S. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 12:44 pm
Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation (Navajo and Hopi Indian Land Settlement Act of 1974; Administrative Procedure Act) United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 1:15 pm
via lawliberty.org Mark Pulliam. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 10:30 am
In political, scientific, and artistic history, consider any biography or history describing Cleopatra, Mark Antony, Hannibal, Vincent van Gogh, Alan Turing, Ernest Hemingway, Marilyn Monroe, or Kurt Cobain. [read post]
27 Feb 2024, 7:12 am
The book draws on the author's wealth of experience to produce an excellent resource on the practice and procedure before the United Kingdom trade mark registry. [read post]
25 Feb 2024, 5:13 pm
Vázquez will focus on developments in the United States, including such recent decisions as Mallory v. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
The former year marked the formation of the rock-hard conservative majority that would thereafter dominate the Taft Court. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
Things can be source identifiers, without being commercial source identifiers (United We Stand): confusion but not dilution actionable Jack Daniel’s didn’t purport to decide the full scope of the “noncommercial” exclusion. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
”[29]The Court in this case used a methodology that was a marked departure from the approach it has had used in previous cases brought under the Genocide Convention. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:00 am
” Although the terms of the Insurrection Act suggested that the militias would be federalized when civilian authorities were overwhelmed, in 1827 the Supreme Court indicated, in a case called Martin v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 7:00 am
Consider, for instance, the end of the Court’s per curiam opinion in Bush v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
In 1918, in Hammer v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 7:13 pm
As Professor Mark W. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 2:16 pm
We view recent posts by Mark Graber and others in a similar fashion. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 9:30 pm
Rev. 2135 (2023).ICYMI: "Of Course Presidents Are Officers of the United States," says Mark Graber (The Atlantic). [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 5:44 pm
The reason is quite simple--the mid 1970s marked the end of the leadership of the so-called Cuban Revolutionary government(s) established after 1959 within and around which operated the integrated revolutionary organizations (among them Fidel Castro's 26th of July Movement) which served as the nucleus of what became the Cuban Communist Party. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:13 pm
Then, in Lexmark v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 7:00 am
Bell as well as the anti-miscegenation statute at issue in Loving v. [read post]
