Search for: "MARRIAGE OF LAWRENCE" Results 121 - 140 of 893
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2015, 1:45 pm
" And Lawrence Hurley of Reuters reports that "Supreme Court to decide if states can ban gay marriage. [read post]
12 Sep 2015, 2:02 pm by Tom Smith
Considering the case of Kim Davis, the recalcitrant Kentucky county clerk jailed over her refusal to issue marriage licenses to homosexual couples, Professor Krauss writes: “The Kim Davis story raises a basic question: To what extent should we allow people to break the law if their religious views are in conflict with it? [read post]
19 May 2008, 6:00 am
As the United States Supreme Court observed in its decision in Lawrence v. [read post]
26 Jul 2009, 12:05 am
Lawson Lawrence, entered into in February 2005 was valid and enforceable.Her attorney, Martin Fierman, of Eatonton, argues that the prenuptial agreement is not binding because only one witness signed the agreement and because Lawson Lawrence did not fully disclose his income and assets.Under state law, any contract "made in contemplation of marriage" must be verified by at least two witnesses in order to be valid.But the husband's attorney, Kice Stone,… [read post]
29 Oct 2011, 1:26 pm by Gregory Forman
  For a fuller discussion of the impact of Lawrence on statutes criminalizing adultery see, The Validity of Criminal Adultery Prohibitions After Lawrence v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 7:02 am by Erin Daly
Romer v Evans and Lawrence v Texas), courts tend to conflate the two strands of rights. [read post]
2 Oct 2014, 7:35 am
" Lawrence Hurley of Reuters reports that "U.S. top court takes up key housing discrimination case. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 2:57 am by Ilya Somin
Hardwick helped set the stage for Lawrence v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:57 pm by David Markus
As Verrilli began to discuss Lawrence v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 2:09 pm by Andrew Hamm
This morning the Court issued additional orders from the Justices’ September 29 Conference, including orders in which it denied review of all seven petitions arising out of challenges to state bans on same-sex marriage. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 6:38 am by Kenji Yoshino
” Under the first, the Court would uphold governmental restrictions on same-sex marriage; under the latter, it would invalidate them. [read post]
15 Nov 2009, 4:15 pm
Although the public, in the aggregate, backlashed against same sex marriage in the wake of Lawrence v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 3:29 pm by Jason Mazzone
 Lawrence, 539 U.S. at 601 (Scalia, J., dissenting).Inasmuch as Justice Scalia has never "recommended" that lower federal courts strike down state marriage laws, Judge Shelby's "agreement" with Scalia is nothing of the kind. [read post]