Search for: "MATTER OF ABRAHAM v. Justices"
Results 121 - 140
of 155
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 10:43 am
In United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:05 pm
To them, the majority ignored a bedrock principle of bankruptcy law, which Justice Alito most recently reiterated in Travelers v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 4:49 am
According to people familiar with the matter, the Justice Department is currently in talks with Pence’s legal team about scheduling the search. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 8:30 am
During his time as a teacher he has also argued a number of major cases in state and federal courts, most notably Daubert v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 5:45 am
”[vi] Klein repeatedly stated throughout the interview that he first went to Colombia in 1987 when the national police contracted his company Speardhead Ltd. to train its members in matters of defense and security. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 5:00 am
In Genesis 18:23-32, it states, “Abraham drew near, and said, “Will you consume the righteous with the wicked? [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 9:34 am
A: Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) ____ Q: What is the subject matter of 17 USC 119? [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 7:06 am
The matter-of-fact tone of this comment is very revealing. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 7:06 am
The matter-of-fact tone of this comment is very revealing. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
One of the things that originalists understand and that Vermeule seemingly doesn't is that a democratic constitution is supposed to be an exercise of popular sovereignty, and that has to matter for its role in present political life. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 6:24 am
In my previous posts (here and here), I drew attention to the frequently neglected fact that there are, in effect, three Necessary and Proper clauses in the Constitution, and I sketched a number of claims about the origin and meaning of these clauses, highlighting the distinction between the Foregoing Powers and All Other Powers provisions. [read post]
20 May 2014, 6:08 am
But don’t get carried away with such peripheral matters: your real job is to make the most out of the case-law. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 6:53 pm
In light of the Supreme Court decision this week in Kimbrough v. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 7:35 am
A recently published decision, Mendoza v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 4:45 pm
” As seven justices did in [Hamdan v. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm
In Milieudefensie et al. v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm
Although each member of Congress certainly has his or her own nuanced understanding of the Constitution, the model for constitutional interpretation for many conservatives on Capitol Hill is Justice Scalia, who is well known for his commitment to textualism—to applying the text of the document as “intelligent and informed people of the time” of the document’s enactment would have. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:35 am
On July 17, 1998, one hundred and sixty nations adopted the Rome Statute, a treaty that established the International Criminal Court (“ICC”).[35] The ICC is a permanent court that does not replace national criminal justice systems but rather is an investigative court that only prosecutes when a nation is unable to or refuses to.[36] The ICC has jurisdiction over genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity, and the crime of aggression.[37] The act of “intentionally… [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 5:00 pm
Today’s conservative high court justices have incrementally dismantled certain tenets of the free speech legacy of the Warren Court – what with their more than occasional disfavor for overbreadth challenges, their approval of public-forum restrictions via “content-neutral” time, place, and manner regulations, and the Robert Court’s more recent handiwork in Holder, Attorney General v. [read post]
