Search for: "MATTER OF B B J B"
Results 121 - 140
of 5,765
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am
Agents often earn a small commission from the works that their principals purchase, while a seller or dealer keeps the difference between what they purchased the work for and what they made off it.[12] B. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 3:05 pm
” b. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 12:48 pm
B. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 12:26 pm
"[J]udicial impartiality and fairness mandate that we hold pro se appellants to the same standards as parties represented by lawyers. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
The court properly determined that the heightened pleading standard of CPLR 3016(b) does not apply to plaintiff's negligence-based breach of fiduciary duty claims under Swiss law. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
The court properly determined that the heightened pleading standard of CPLR 3016(b) does not apply to plaintiff's negligence-based breach of fiduciary duty claims under Swiss law. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 9:05 pm
To be sure, these changes can matter, but they are not the kinds of rules most people have in mind when they are assessing rulemaking activity of an agency. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 11:53 am
The plaintiff then filed a Rule 60(b) motion to set aside the judgment, claiming that the undisclosed evidence amounted to fraud and misrepresentation. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:44 pm
§1326(b). [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
I worked on competition-advocacy matters at the FTC for about 16 years, and I honestly have no idea what they heck they are talking about. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 5:21 am
There is another injury, of course, and it is the one that really matters, for the two of us, given our particular circumstances. [read post]
11 Feb 2024, 4:01 am
Côté J., for her part, would have allowed the appeal in part to substitute an attempted fraud conviction for the fraud conviction, substantially for the reasons of Cotnam J.A., and would have remitted the matter to the trial court for sentencing. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 6:20 am
” Twelve Knotts, 87 Md.App. at 104, 589 A.2d 105 (quoting l2, J. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm
” Reviewing the words complained of, the House of Lords considered whether, although no facts were expressly referred to, there was a “sufficient substratum of fact stated or indicated in the words which are the subject-matter of the action. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 2:54 pm
The plaintiff in error, Nickola J. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 2:26 pm
§ 9-11-54(b). [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 6:22 am
Indeed, Justice Gorsuch previewed his opinion on the matter in his statement denying certiorari to an earlier challenge to the bump stock ban, writing, “whatever else one thinks about Chevron, it has no role to play when liberty is at stake. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
I want to suggest, though, that, while overturning Chevron would indeed be a matter of seismic legal importance, it might not be for the reasons most commonly mentioned. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1] This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 8:09 am
John B. [read post]
