Search for: "MATTER OF C B J B"
Results 121 - 140
of 3,064
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2022, 1:36 am
The examining division equated the term "embodiment" with subject-matter that has to fall "within the scope of the invention as defined by the claims", and concluded that the description so adapted was not in conformity with the independent claims, contrary to Rule 42(1)(c) EPC, because the term "embodiment" was used in parts of the description that describe subject-matter that was not part of the subject-matter of these… [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
See points [2.5] and [2(b)] of the reasons and the order, respectively. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 4:08 am
Mar. 4, 2008) (Lefkow, J.).Judge Lefkow dismissed defendant Ivanova for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, held that the Court had subject matter jurisdiction over defendant Kyrsides, and denied defendants' Fed. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 1:42 pm
” [7] In both cases, the Court held that “because the text of Section 10(b) does not prohibit aiding and abetting … a private plaintiff may not maintain an aiding and abetting suit under 10(b). [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 8:38 am
The case was prosecuted by Senior Litigation Counsel Richard J. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 8:38 am
The case was prosecuted by Senior Litigation Counsel Richard J. [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 1:13 am
Their collective view was that shape element (A) fell foul of Article 3(1)(e)(i) and shape elements (B) and (C) fell foul of Article 3(1)(e)(ii), but that neither Article 3(1)(e)(i) nor (ii) applied to all of (A), (B) and (C) together. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 3:49 pm
Reg. 44/2014, Sch. 1, s. 12 (c).] [read post]
20 Mar 2010, 11:22 pm
§ 157(b)(2)(C)) are defined as "core"? [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 4:11 am
J.). [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm
”[2] The subject matter of decision G 1/09 was a divisional application filed after a decision refusing the parent application had been rendered, but before the appeal period had expired. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
Insofar as the European patent has not yet been granted (R 16(1)(b)) this third party may, no later than three months after the decision recognising its entitlement has become final (R 16(1)(a)), in respect of Contacting States designated in the EP application in which the decision has been taken or recognised or must be recognised on the basis of the Protocol on Recognition:(a) prosecute the EP application as its own application in place of the applicant (A 61(1)(a));(b) file a… [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 7:45 am
Mar. 3, 2011) (Kendall, J.). [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 11:14 am
P. 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 10:21 am
The Court focused on the matter of conscience. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 3:12 am
Robert J. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 10:59 am
., April 8, 2011, Nealon, J.)(32 pages), Judge Terrence R. [read post]
16 Dec 2006, 8:56 pm
Birkholz, Brian C. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 3:12 pm
Id., see also Matter of Y-B-, 21 I&N Dec. at 1139. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 5:50 am
Juror C then announced that `no matter what happens, my verdict is for guilty. [read post]
