Search for: "MATTER OF D V"
Results 121 - 140
of 22,891
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2024, 7:15 am
§ 254(d) that would require federal Universal Service Fund contributions by ISPs: “[W]e believe that any decisions on whether and how to make BIAS providers contribute to USF funding are best addressed holistically in [] ongoing discussions of USF contribution reform, on a full record and with robust input from all interested parties, than in this proceeding. [read post]
14 May 2024, 6:00 am
Florio of counsel), for appellant.Paul D. [read post]
14 May 2024, 6:00 am
Florio of counsel), for appellant.Paul D. [read post]
13 May 2024, 8:48 pm
Jackknife truck accidents, a distressing occurrence on our roads, manifest when the tractor and trailer of a semi-truck veer in disparate directions, resulting in a folding motion resembling a ‘V’ or ‘L’ shape. [read post]
13 May 2024, 12:09 pm
” The plaintiffs sought to rely on a 1969 Delaware Superior Court opinion, Wright Construction Co. v. [read post]
12 May 2024, 9:01 pm
An increasing number of states have enacted or are considering enacting legislation requiring financial institutions to provide customers “fair access” to financial services. [read post]
12 May 2024, 3:51 am
General guidance on confidentiality: the Fujifilm v Kodak decision, LD Düsseldorf, UPC_CFI_355/2023, 27 March 2024 In these proceedings, the defence to infringement was based on a prior use argument deriving from an acquisition in 2017. [read post]
11 May 2024, 10:09 am
This statute is written in a cumbersome matter which largely describes what the statute does not allow. [read post]
10 May 2024, 12:57 pm
As always, I’d love to hear what you think. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 4:34 am
” People v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:07 pm
By my count, Gorsuch would have DIG'd Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
The appeal must be dismissed.Respondent has, through board policy, “delegate[d] its authority to designate library materials to be used in the [d]istrict to the school library media specialist(s). [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am
The appeal must be dismissed.Respondent has, through board policy, “delegate[d] its authority to designate library materials to be used in the [d]istrict to the school library media specialist(s). [read post]
8 May 2024, 1:58 pm
Smith (Sigmund D. [read post]
8 May 2024, 1:14 pm
Louis case, Minor v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 1:14 pm
Louis case, Minor v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 7:19 am
” Hewlett-Packard Co. v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Vaseliou of the bar of the State of Texas, admitted pro hac vice of counsel), for Parents Defending Education, respondent.The New York Civil Liberties Union, New York (Stefanie D. [read post]