Search for: "MATTER OF E K D K"
Results 121 - 140
of 1,192
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jul 2022, 11:21 am
Under Fed.R.Evid. 801(d)(2)(E), ‘a statement by a co-conspirator of a party during the course and in furtherance of the conspiracy is not hearsay,’ and is therefore admissible as substantive evidence against the party. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 2:09 pm
” The authors begin their analysis of specific causation with a brief acknowledgement that our legal system could abandon any effort to set standards or require rigorous thinking on the matter by simply leaving the matter to the jury.[9] After all, this laissez-faire approach had been the rule of law for centuries. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
The SEC explained: [W]e believe that NEPA requires and authorizes the Commission to consider the promotion of environmental protection along with other considerations in determining whether to require affirmative disclosures by registrants under the Securities Act and the Securities and Exchange Act . . . . [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 2:15 pm
Factors to be considered In determining the best interests of the child, the court shall consider all factors related to the circumstances of the child, including: (a) the child’s needs, given the child’s age and stage of development, such as the child’s need for stability;(b) the nature and strength of the child’s relationship with each spouse, each of the child’s siblings and grandparents and any other person who plays an important role in the… [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 9:33 pm
Corenthal and Paul K. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 9:33 pm
Corenthal and Paul K. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:01 pm
E. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:09 am
Attorney General (a/k/a NetChoice v. [read post]
19 May 2022, 6:03 am
The federal government spends excise tax revenue on health-care costs, and the states spend their revenue on a wide variety of priorities—although rarely enough on cessation programs.[9] MSA payments are a more delicate matter. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am
"[T]he possibility that a judgment rendered without the omitted party could have an adverse practical effect on that party is enough to indicate joinder" (Matter of Nemeth v K-Tooling, 163 AD3d 1143, 1144 [2018] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Matter of 27th St. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am
"[T]he possibility that a judgment rendered without the omitted party could have an adverse practical effect on that party is enough to indicate joinder" (Matter of Nemeth v K-Tooling, 163 AD3d 1143, 1144 [2018] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Matter of 27th St. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am
"[T]he possibility that a judgment rendered without the omitted party could have an adverse practical effect on that party is enough to indicate joinder" (Matter of Nemeth v K-Tooling, 163 AD3d 1143, 1144 [2018] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Matter of 27th St. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am
"[T]he possibility that a judgment rendered without the omitted party could have an adverse practical effect on that party is enough to indicate joinder" (Matter of Nemeth v K-Tooling, 163 AD3d 1143, 1144 [2018] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Matter of 27th St. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 10:14 pm
All that matters is that we fix it and try to make sure it doesn’t happen again. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 11:21 am
Costello claims that prosecutors are doing grave injustices to his client, Stephen K. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 7:28 am
That rule, promulgated in 1968, identified its authority as sections 2(d) and 2(e) of the Clayton Act, rather than UMC under Section 5 of the FTC Act. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 4:22 am
Signup to receive the Early Edition in your inbox here. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm
§552(b)(7)(E). [read post]
16 Apr 2022, 9:05 pm
E., R. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 5:29 am
Hall, Margaret E. [read post]
