Search for: "MATTER OF J C B" Results 121 - 140 of 3,043
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2008, 12:19 pm
In a matter of first impression, Justice John Hedigan of the High Court of Ireland (a trial court) has ruled in J. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
This is in line with decisions T 842/90 and J 20/00 where it was considered possible that the payment of an additional fee amounting to [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 3:13 am
Park, Judge.Representing Appellant Hull: Frank J. [read post]
21 Apr 2019, 11:30 am by Ray Dowd
The court may conduct hearings or make referrals—preserving any federal statutory right to a jury trial—when, to enter or effectuate judgment, it needs to:(A) conduct an accounting;(B) determine the amount of damages;(C) establish the truth of any allegation by evidence; or(D) investigate any other matter. [read post]
26 May 2015, 3:23 pm
Despite the agency's diligent efforts, the father failed to avail himself of the various resources necessary for reunification (see, Social Services Law § 384-b[7][c]; Matter of Reggie B., 223 A.D.2d 471, 636 N.Y.S.2d 790; Matter of Dutchess County Dept. of Social Servs. [read post]
23 Mar 2024, 6:00 am by Kristi L. Wolff
In determining “whether any advertising concerning a food or food product is false or misleading,” courts must also consider factors including—but not limited to—the following: “(a) subject matter; (b) visual content; (c) use of animated characters or child-oriented activities and incentives; (d) music or other audio content; (e) age of models; (f) presence of child celebrities or celebrities who appeal to children; (g) language; (h) competent… [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
 According to the Opinion, Plaintiff in this matter moved to amend its Complaint to add a party well after the expiration of the deadline for amendments to pleadings that the district court had set in a Scheduling Order. [read post]
Simply put, the CJEU found that a first SPC granted for a single active ingredient A may preclude the subsequent grant of a second SPC for a combination of active ingredients A+B under Article 3(c) if the two SPCs are based on the same patent, if the scope of protection conferred by the first SPC already encompasses the combination of A+B, and if the combination of A+B is not an “independent invention”, i.e., an invention in its own right that is… [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
In later decisions J 24/96 [2] and T 1382/08 [1.1], however, the question is discussed in detail and answered by stating that the allocation pursuant to A 21(3)(c) unambiguously provides that the LBA is competent. [read post]