Search for: "MATTER OF J K C"
Results 121 - 140
of 911
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2022, 11:21 am
Criminal defense attorney Robert J. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 10:38 am
Rev. 629-648 (2010).GREAT LAKES.Kilbert, Kenneth K. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 9:41 pm
Lenz, Principal Medical Device Regulation Expert & Steven J. [read post]
17 May 2023, 10:31 am
Hilty, Andrzej Jakubowski, Marie-Christine Janssens, Bernd Justin Jütte, Stavroula Karapapa, Jessica C. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 3:02 am
On Thursday 18 June 2020, the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in In the matter of XY (Scotland). [read post]
3 May 2020, 4:16 pm
DLA Piper Privacy Matters had a post “EU: Europe’s toolbox for building complaint Corona tracking apps”. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Dubinsky of counsel), for respondent.Richard J. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Dubinsky of counsel), for respondent.Richard J. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 2:10 pm
We noted some stern words on failure to follow protocol and failure to disclose material facts from Munby J here. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 2:10 pm
We noted some stern words on failure to follow protocol and failure to disclose material facts from Munby J here. [read post]
19 May 2013, 5:01 pm
J 7/83 [12]) and a subjective “error of judgment” (Fehleinschätzung) of the first instance (see, e.g. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 1:52 pm
Tran & J. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 1:52 pm
Tran & J. [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 7:21 am
This post is by my colleagues Michael Kaplan, Richard J. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 2:07 pm
J is for Junk Fees K is for Kidnapped Children L is for Life Insurance M is for Miscellaneous Income – Want more taxgirl goodness? [read post]
20 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm
EPO Guidelines C-VI 8.2). [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 6:17 am
Matter of Blatt 2023 NY Slip Op 04120 Decided on August 2, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Per Curiam is both a common and unusual attorney story. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 8:05 am
In all custody matters, our primary concern is, and must continue to be, the well-being of the most fragile human participant—that of the minor child. [read post]
15 May 2011, 3:01 pm
The appellant had implicitly acknowledged this contradiction by limiting the claims to signed data […]. iii) The advantages linked to the new features (b) and (c) were not related in any obvious way to avoiding an unauthorised manipulation, which was the only problem mentioned in the description, and the Guidelines for examination (C-IV 9.8.2) did not allow a corresponding reformulation of the problem […].[3] R 86(4) EPC 1973 lays down that amended claims may not… [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 1:06 am
C&J Coupe Family Ltd. [read post]