Search for: "MATTER OF PEOPLE v. Parker" Results 121 - 140 of 239
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2015, 8:40 am
Parker would still continue unless and until Berman is also overruled. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
 A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 2:26 pm by Lyle Denniston
  And, as a general matter, his skepticism seemed to be fairly widely shared across the bench. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 4:33 pm
If there is a reason to protect official state agencies, one possible reason could be that (given Parker v. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 2:01 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
See Judge Elsa Alcala's opinion (pdf) on behalf of the majority, a concurrence (pdf) from Judge Tom Price, and a dissent (pdf) from Judge Lawrence Meyers.The case - Wehrenberg v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 4:00 am by Devlin Hartline
It matters not if the wrongdoer doesn’t prevent the property owner from also exercising dominion over the property. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
11 Oct 2012, 4:04 pm
(The title , which I have used in various forms before, recalls J Jonah Jameson, the irascible boss of Peter Parker aka SpiderMan whom JJJ of course famously detested. [read post]