Search for: "MATTER OF POWERS v. Powers"
Results 121 - 140
of 21,472
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2014, 1:14 pm
In R & G Draper Farms (Keswick) Ltd. v. 1758691 Ontario Inc., the Ontario Court of Appeal recently held that an Ontario court has no power to extend the time for an application to review or appeal from a domestic arbitration award. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 10:21 am
APPA’s original comments also addressed a wide range of issues that stretched well into technical concerns regarding particulate matter, monitoring, and recommendation for mercury only (no acid gas) controls. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 10:55 am
Shelby County v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 12:20 pm
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 07-0353, 2009 MT 286, REBECCA E. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 12:18 pm
Recently, the issue of whether CWA § 316(b) requires retrofitting closed cycle cooling at existing power plants as a matter of course made it to the Supreme Court, in Entergy v Riverkeeper. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 11:30 am
Citing Gordon v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 2:37 pm
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 10-0337, 2011 MT 144, THE CITY OF GREAT FALLS, BENEFIS HEALTH CARE, INC., and ELECTRIC CITY POWER, INC., Petitioners and Appellees, v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 9:00 pm
Matter of Matter of County of Putnam v Putnam County Sheriff's Employees Assn., Inc., 2011 NY Slip Op 09320, Appellate Division, Second Department In this CPLR Article 75 action the County asked Supreme Court to vacate an arbitration award. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 8:57 am
If the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 2:59 am
Recently, a two judge Bench of the Supreme Court of India had the occasion in Arasmeta Captive Power Co. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 7:35 pm
In December, the justices heard argument in Moore v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 1:27 pm
As a practical matter, the courts’ permissive approach invites “adventurous assertions of statutory power by presidents,” in the words of Professor Kevin Stack. [read post]
12 May 2022, 5:01 am
Less than one year after Olmstead, the Court granted certiorari in Maryland Casualty v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Thus, separation of powers is "implied by the separate grants of power to each of the coordinate branches of government" (Bourquin v Cuomo, 85 NY2d 781, 784 [1995] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]). [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am
Thus, separation of powers is "implied by the separate grants of power to each of the coordinate branches of government" (Bourquin v Cuomo, 85 NY2d 781, 784 [1995] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]). [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 6:26 am
[no commandeering of state legislatures] & Printz v U.S. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 12:45 pm
Alcorn County Electric Power Association (“ACE”) began supplying The Door Shop, Inc. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 4:23 am
In the work comp world, a prime example is pending before the California Supreme Court in the Stevens v. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 11:59 am
Texas v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 12:09 pm
(v) Interest pendente lite is not a matter of substantive law, like interest for the period anterior to reference (pre-reference period). [read post]
