Search for: "MATTER OF S C B C and J C" Results 121 - 140 of 2,955
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2015, 6:00 am
Matter of Christo’s INC., 26 I&N Dec. 537 (AAO 2015); In an odd context for this issue to arise, the AAO found that the INA § 204(c) marriage fraud bar does not apply to completely fabricated marriages, that is, marriages that never actually existed in the first place. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 2:37 am by Dave
Following hard on the heels of Js excellent post on the Immigration Bill, we now have further discussion of the EU right to reside rules by the CJEU in Jobcenter Berlin Neukolln v Alimanovic  Case C-67/14 (to which I might say, good luck landlords). [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 6:00 pm by Josh Blackman
On March 12, the Judicial Conference announced that certain litigants who want to prevent a federal or state law or policy from taking effect should be forced to litigate before a judge in a randomly chosen division—no matter how large the judicial district, and no matter how far away the randomly-chosen judge. [read post]
26 Apr 2008, 12:19 pm
In a matter of first impression, Justice John Hedigan of the High Court of Ireland (a trial court) has ruled in J. [read post]
26 May 2011, 10:03 am by Joel R. Brandes
[DELETED] (d) An advertisement that complies with paragraph (e) may contain the following: (1) statements that are reasonably likely to create an expectation about results the lawyer can achieve; (2) statements that compare the lawyer's services with the services of other lawyers; (3) testimonials or endorsements of clients, where not prohibited by paragraph (c)(1), and of former clients; or [DELETED “where not prohibited by paragraph (c)(1)”] (4)… [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 8:09 am
The first prong narrows to three specific types of abstract ideas: (a) mathematical concepts; (b) certain methods of organizing human activity; and (c) mental processes. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 4:33 pm by Ira Meislik
It could be: (a) yes; (b) no, not at all; (c) some parts yes, and some parts no; (d) no, but it will be treated as if it were; and (e) no, but it may affect the parties’ later agreement. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 9:13 am by Elliot Setzer
(NEA), section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (8 U.S.C. 1182(f)), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code, I, DONALD J. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:45 am by Eugene Volokh
But restrictions on speech that is outside the CDA's scope should not be seen as immunized by § 230(c)(2). [read post]
16 Nov 2020, 1:00 am by Jocelyn Hutton
Hearings in the Supreme Court are now shown live on the Court’s website. [read post]