Search for: "MATTER OF T A AND T R A"
Results 121 - 140
of 53,756
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2011, 5:01 pm
As a matter of fact, no “fresh case” should be brought (B. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm
According to the Examining Division, the subject-matter claimed in the sole request lacked inventive step and claim 5 was not clear. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 3:01 pm
This is because such statements are not “relevant” to the decision which the Board has to take, within the meaning of R 124(1). [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 8:28 am
By Big Tent Democrat Markos writes another post attacking the Clinton campaign, nothing new there, but I found this part deeply ironic: So the Clinton campaign has graduated from saying that certain states don't matter, to saying certain voters don't matter, to now saying that the Democratic Party electorate doesn't matter. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm
Instead he requested that a decision under R 111(2) be issued on the basis of the submissions filed so far. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
”[3.4] In the present case […] the ED summoned to OPs indicating that claims 1 and 15 lacked clarity and that the subject-matter of these claims lacked novelty in view of D3. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 3:01 pm
If you read the whole story, you will find interesting things on T 352/04 and on the requirements of R 80. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 5:01 pm
T 187/95 [8] and T 105/93 [6]) and as the essential facts and the technical considerations on which the objection of lack of clarity raised in the decision, regarding the determination of the point of intersection is based, significantly differ from those on which the corresponding objection in the notification of the ED is based, the decision was based on grounds which the appellant had no opportunity to comment. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 5:01 pm
In summary, A 113(1) does not merely require a party to be given an opportunity to voice comments; more importantly, it requires the deciding instance to demonstrably hear and consider them (T 763/04 [4.4]; T 246/08 [2.6]). [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 3:01 pm
T 278/00 and T 897/03), that the decision under appeal be set aside. [read post]
6 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm
That specific surface is measured by a single point method in accordance with JIS-R-1626 […]. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
According to R 137(3), no further amendment may be made without the consent of the Examining Division (ED). [read post]
29 May 2010, 6:00 am
” T-Shirt. [read post]
KLAVAN ON THE CULTURE: What’s the Matter With America? (Soros, Huffington, Maher, & Olbermann Can’t…
19 Nov 2010, 11:59 am
KLAVAN ON THE CULTURE: What’s the Matter With America? [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 3:58 pm
DANA LOESCH: Do Keith Olbermann and Markos Moulitsas Think That Rape Doesn’t Matter? [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 6:01 pm
G 1/05 [11.1] and T 600/08 [2.3]. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 8:29 am
In this respect, a discrepancy between this embodiment and the claimed subject-matter appears in the terminology used. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 3:01 pm
As stated in T 448/89, a mere reference to documents was not sufficient. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm
The basis on which the status of opponent is obtained and enjoyed is thus a matter of procedural law (G 3/97 [2.1]). [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 5:01 pm
This amendment is considered by the [patent proprietor] to represent a mere correction under R 139 of the wording of claim 1 as granted. [4] R 139 (former R 88 EPC 1973) provides in its second sentence that a correction of errors in documents filed with the EPO that concerns the description, claims or drawings can only be allowed if the correction is obvious in the sense that it is immediately evident that nothing else would have been intended than what is offered as… [read post]
