Search for: "MATTER OF T B" Results 121 - 140 of 19,993
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2019, 6:01 am by Andrew Patterson
In Matter of M-S-, Attorney General Barr overruled Matter of X-K-, relying on INA § 235(b)(1)(B)(ii), which provides that a person who establishes a credible fear of persecution “shall be detained for further consideration of the application for asylum. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 2:26 pm by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 10-0349, 2011 MT 217, MUSSELSHELL RANCH COMPANY, a Montana corporation; MARY T. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 11:53 am by Gregory Forman
 If I had noticed the deposition of the DSS caseworker and superviser, the answers could have been used to impeach these witnesses but weren’t binding on DSS. [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Since [INC1] was published on 10 August 2000 it is pertinent prior art against the present application for subject-matter having the filing date as its effective date which is the case for claim 1.[3.2] Incorporated applications [INC2] and [INC3] do not fulfil the requirements set out in T 737/90 [3] and Case Law, 7th ed. 2013, II. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 2:20 am by Walter Olson
., that charged him $4 more than your website said because you don’t update your website as often as you ought. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 8:14 am by Roel van Woudenberg
G 1/03 and G 2/10 relate to different cases, so cannot prima facie be considered as somehow conflicting, but Board 3.3.09 made the currently pending referral G 1/16 while handling appeal T 0437/14 asking a.o. whether the G 2/10 decision effects how some aspects of G 1/03 shall be interpreted. [read post]
6 Nov 2011, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
As a matter of fact, A 84 (EPC 1973) together with R 29 (EPC 1973) requires a claim to give all the essential features that are necessary for defining the invention.This requirements has also been affirmed in decision G 1/07 [4.2.2; 3.3.1 – should read 4.3.1]. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 3:01 pm by oliver randl
Only the choice of a lower value for Al2O3 and a higher value for K2O would lead to subject-matter falling within the terms of claim 1 at issue; each of the other three choices necessary would lead outside the claimed subject-matter. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The beta-casein A2, A3, D and E variants contain a proline at position 67 whereas in the beta-casein variants A1, B, C and F proline-67 is substituted by a histidine (see page 13, lines 24 to 27). [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 11:28 am by Joshua Weisenfeld
Finally, the Federal Circuit notes that “[b]ecause ‘encrypted communications’ and ‘program code’ are not being claimed here for the content they communication, they are not printed matter,” and thus, “[t]he inquiry stops there; if the claim element is not printed matter, we need not consider whether it has a functional or structural relation to its substrate. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 12:55 pm by Michael Markarian
It doesn’t matter whether we—or other newspapers—opposed it, whether a vast majority of counties rejected it or whether legislators are happy with the outcome. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 8:07 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Similar to its federal counterpart, Texas Rule of Evidence 606(b) provides that Upon an inquiry into the validity of a verdict or indictment, a juror may not testify as to any matter or statement occurring during the jury's deliberations, or... [read post]