Search for: "MATTER OF W L C L B L" Results 121 - 140 of 743
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2019, 1:49 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  The attempt here is not just to get the regulations into the agreements but to get to ICANN to enforce content regulations.Q: if an applicant made promises & got the domain b/c of the promises, it’s sensible for ICANN to be one of the entities that can hold them to its promise. [read post]
20 May 2016, 10:07 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Does interference w/TM interests matter any more than other deception? [read post]
3 May 2016, 2:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  We have so many now b/c the system doesn’t work. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 11:30 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Q: ROP statute was enacted 115 years ago b/c a young woman’s picture was put on a flour bag. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 12:38 pm by Stephen Bilkis
These conditions continued to exist when the derivative neglect hearing regarding C was held similar to the cases of Matter of Suzanne RR., Matter of Landon W. and Matter of Natasha RR. [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 11:48 am
Karesh Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a Fitness Together (NFP) - "Johnny L. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 10:03 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Coplay Cement Co., 44 F 277: no cause of action for false advertising of geographic origin b/c of Pandora’s box—no one can sue for public nuisance w/o specific injury/invasion of property right. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 11:34 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  She’s seen citations of use in patent names; unit of food in nutrition label.Justin Hughes: the PTO doesn’t need to worry about prescription drugs b/c the FDA will do it for them. [read post]
1 May 2016, 11:07 am by Rebecca Tushnet
They also argue that IRUs raise the specter of state action: allowing private action to be held to const’l standards where state affirmatively encourages actor; §1983 suits would be dismissed b/c of §230 immunity. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:50 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Addit’l burden of processing in ID’ing real complaint. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 9:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 A: I want you to be able to reply to a C&D with “no, b/c X. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 5:31 am
(See TTABlog postings here and here).Text and Photograph Copyright John L. [read post]