Search for: "MATTER OF W L C L B L" Results 121 - 140 of 743
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2021, 4:51 am by Matthias Weller
“, University of Pittsburgh Law Review, forthcoming, (available here) Çaliskan, Yusuf; Çaliskan, Zeynep “2 Temmuz 2019 Tarihli Yabanci Mahkeme Kararlarinin Taninmasi ve Tenfizine Iliskin Lahey Anlasmasinin Degerlendirilmesi”, Public and Private International Law Bulletin 40 (2020), pp 231-245 (available here) (An Evaluation of 2 July 2019 Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters) Chen, Wendy… [read post]
24 Jul 2021, 11:51 am by admin
Comment b to Section 433A circuitously and vacuously defines “distinct harms” as those “results which, by their nature, are more capable of apportionment. [read post]
10 Jul 2021, 6:20 am by Russell Knight
 “[L]ost profits cannot be based upon conjecture or sheer speculation. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 9:04 am
The contribution argues that the resulting context provides a basis for either for extending sovereign immunity to those regulatory responsibilities of all economic actors (irrespective of their public or private ownership) or of the reconception of sovereign regulation through legal compliance obligations as inherently commercial and thus not protected b principles of sovereign immunity when undertaken by SOEs. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 9:45 am by Eugene Volokh
Rather, it should be read as objectionable in ways "similar in nature" to the ways that the preceding terms are objectionable.[12] [B.] [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 10:37 am by Jon Sands
§ 3553(f)(1)(A)–(C) (emphasis added).1 As a matter of first impression, we must interpret the “and” joining subsections (A), (B), and (C) under § 3553(f)(1). [read post]
13 May 2021, 7:06 am by Bryce Klehm
     (d)  Within 90 days of receipt of the recommendations described in subsection (b) of this section, the FAR Council shall review the proposed contract language and conditions and, as appropriate, shall publish for public comment proposed updates to the FAR. [read post]
7 May 2021, 7:07 pm
The applicants consider that the member States share a presumed responsibility with regard to climate change and that the uncertainty as to the “fair share” of this contribution between the member States can only operate in the applicants’ favour.They emphasise the absolute urgency of taking action in favour of the climate and consider that, in this context, it is crucial that the Court recognise the States’ shared responsibility and exempt the applicants from the obligation… [read post]
13 Apr 2021, 2:30 am by Sander van Rijnswou
An attempt was made to interrupt the proceedings under Rule 142(1)(b) EPC  or under Rule 84(2), first sentence, EPC but these were rejected. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 11:45 am by Rebecca Tushnet
A: It could—he sees Minaj as definitely within scope b/c it’s not substitutional copying. [read post]
17 Feb 2021, 2:16 am by Matthias Weller
“, University of Pittsburgh Law Review, forthcoming, (available here) Çaliskan, Yusuf; Çaliskan, Zeynep “2 Temmuz 2019 Tarihli Yabanci Mahkeme Kararlarinin Taninmasi ve Tenfizine Iliskin Lahey Anlasmasinin Degerlendirilmesi”, Public and Private International Law Bulletin 40 (2020), pp 231-245 (An Evaluation of 2 July 2019 Hague Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Civil or Commercial Matters) Clavel, Sandrine;… [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 2:23 pm by Kevin LaCroix
2020 was an eventful year in the world of corporate and securities litigation. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:43 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Integrity right misundersands relationship b/t author, text and public in way that casts disruptive dialogic engagement as moral and legal wrong; not consistent w/feminist politics of confrontation, resistance, and social reform. [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 7:44 am
                    (B) Public International Organizations: Students will consider the way that the collective of states have built t [read post]