Search for: "MAY v. OBAMA"
Results 121 - 140
of 5,571
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2011, 8:25 pm
Since Obama’s National Archives speech of May 2009, it has been clear he supports some form of continued detention without charge for Guantanamo detainees. [read post]
8 May 2010, 10:39 am
Gill et al. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 12:50 pm
But even if both requests are denied, these long-ish deadlines mean that the Obama administration might be able to stretch out the appeals process at the CAFC until early May. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 7:09 am
In Reece v. [read post]
White House Proposes Rules on Domestic Workers to "Overrule" Long Island Health Care at Home v. Coke
15 Dec 2011, 10:56 am
Today, President Obama announced proposed rulemaking to revise the companionship and live-in worker regulations under the Fair Labor Standards Act "to more clearly define the tasks that may be performed by an exempt companion" and " to limit the companionship... [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 2:48 pm
The DOJ lawyer, Dana Lydia Kaersvang, answered yes -- and mentioned Marbury v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 7:19 am
The Phoenix City Council, however, made the decision in May 2010 to stay neutral in the legal battle between the State of Arizona and the federal government over SB 1070. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 8:35 am
Clean Air Council, et al. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 7:58 am
Luis V. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 12:55 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2015, 9:01 pm
Under the Supreme Court’s 1985 ruling in Heckler v. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 1:29 pm
Bank v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 5:24 pm
Obama, in which a Seventh Circuit panel declared that atheists offended by the congressional requirement that the first Thursday in May (that's May 5 in 2011) be proclaimed by the President as a National Day of Prayer lacked standing due to want of personal injury in fact. [read post]
8 May 2012, 10:27 am
The judiciary cannot, as the legislature may, avoid a measure because it approaches the confines of the Constitution. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 1:16 pm
After about nine weeks of opportunity to work out a majority one way or the other to decide the case of United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 7:37 am
Guess it will be Obama v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 9:00 pm
The allocation formula above may change if any contributor makes a contribution that, when allocated, would exceed the amount that the contributor may lawfully give to either participant. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 4:51 pm
In Ogden v. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 3:50 pm
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel on an amicus brief by the American Federation of Teachers and American Association of University Professors in support of the respondents in Friedrichs v. [read post]
23 Jan 2016, 5:08 am
The Fifth Circuit's decision in Texas v. [read post]
