Search for: "MCCOLLUM" Results 121 - 140 of 616
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2014, 6:19 am by Jim Sedor
Now specializing in public policy and regulation at Dentons, an international law firm, McCollum contacted Bondi’s office on behalf of his clients, but did not register himself or list his clients with the state, which is a requirement for anyone who lobbies the executive branch. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 8:52 am by Jim Walker
McCollum claims that as a lawyer he's exempt from registering as a lobbyist. [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 11:24 pm by Jeff Gamso
 And it doesn't follow.Nor, when explaining that lethal injection is a kinder death than Sabrina Buie suffered at the hands of Henry Lee McCollum and Leon Brown and that their execution would not, therefore, offend his sensibility, did he add, as Digby seems to think he meant, that he favored their execution even though they were innocent which would be revealed with their exoneration 20 years in the future.So Judge Kopf rightly took Digby to task. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 9:47 am by Mark Eiglarsh
Leon Brown and Henry McCollum were just 15 and 19 at the time they were arrested for the abhorrent crimes in 1983. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 6:49 pm
 But DNA exonerated McCollum and Brown  and they were released today. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 9:27 am by J. Bradley Smith, Esq.
James McCollum—Henry McCollum’s father—told the Associated Press that he had waited years and years for justice. [read post]
6 Jul 2014, 1:08 pm by Marty Lederman
In earlier posts, such as this one, I noted that in the context of commercial activities, the Supreme Court—and virtually every other court, for that matter—has consistently construed the Free Exercise Clause and religious accommodation statutes not to require religious exemptions from generally applicable regulations, from at least 1944 until this week. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 4:50 am by Marty Lederman
Hyde, Sensenbrenner, McCollum, Coble, Canady, Inglis, and Goodlatte) (“A major issue of contention in the 102nd Congress was whether the bill was a true ‘restoration’ of the law as it existed prior to Smith or whether it sought to impose a statutory standard that was more stringent than that applied prior to Smith. . . . [read post]