Search for: "Mark Case" Results 121 - 140 of 70,265
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2012, 3:00 am by John L. Welch
Here are three recent cases involving motions to amend an opposed mark, each motion having the consent of the non-moving party. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 1:32 am
This question arose in the recent Singapore case of FMTM Distribution Limited v. [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 7:53 am by Ben Luftman
Luftman, Heck & Associates attorney Daniel Sabol represented the woman in her traffic case. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 9:08 am by Marcel Pemsel
Or is this a case where the defendant ‘threatened to infringe’ the trade mark (Art. 130(1) EUTMR), depending on the further intentions of the defendant? [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 6:50 am
Mr Assange has been described as both a “hi-tech terrorist” and “beacon of information freedom” and his cases have wide ranging implications within the law and society as a whole. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 2:57 am
The well-known High Court judge, who took the audience carefully through various key cases on the topic (such as the CJEU Lindt case (C-529/07) and the Redbull v Sun Mark case ([2012] EWHC 1929 (Ch)), focussed specifically on the link between intention to use and the requirement for the EUTM holder not to register the trade mark in ‘bad faith. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 2:51 pm by One LLP
At issue in this case is whether Rollashoe’s trademark, Footzyrolls, likely causes confusion with Tootsie Roll or dilutes the value of the Tootsie Roll mark. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 12:06 pm by Justin E. Gray
  Looking forward to 2011, the filing of false marking cases has not gone down, with over 50 new cases filed in January alone. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 1:28 am
This case generated a notion that a registration of a series of trade marks is a registration of a number of different manifestations of what is essence the same trade mark. [read post]
1 Jan 2024, 1:59 am by Marcel Pemsel
Higher Regional Court of Hamburg, case 5 U 147/09). [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 8:49 am
The doctrine also applies where a weak mark becomes a strong one on account of the use made of it and the advertising efforts put forward by the right holder.In the light of all the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court held that the concept of secondary meaning may thus be used to pursue every nuance in the evolution of a trade mark's distinctive character. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 9:55 am by Dennis Crouch
Matthews extrapolates the case-law to make two primary points: (1) a false-marking defendant cannot be subjected to multiple penalties for the same act of patent false marking; and (2) based on the first-to-file tradition, federal comity, and standing principles, the second-filed suit should be dismissed. [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 10:33 am
Remember, not every injury case will necessarily need a lawyer, but every injury case deserves good legal counsel. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 9:24 am by Marcel Pemsel
However, as the case above shows, an individual mark is not a viable alternative, at least not after the lapse of the 5-year grace period for non-use. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 3:48 pm by Larry Munn
Canadian Dental Association, the Federal Court of Canada held that a professional designation could function as a certification mark, although not  in the case at hand. [read post]