Search for: "Mark Connot"
Results 121 - 140
of 1,140
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2020, 4:14 am
As to the cited word-plus-design mark, the words JUST BARE are the dominant portion.Mello Meats argued that the words "bare" and "just" each have a number of different meanings, "so there is absolutely no way that the Examining Attorney can know which connotation is implied to each of the cited registrations and then the applied-for registration to say that they have similar connotations. [read post]
18 May 2009, 9:17 pm
Nor did the Board point out that, since Applicant's mark and the cited mark both connote "synergy," they would both be pronounced like "synergy. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:18 pm
– Las Vegas lawyer Mark Connot of Fox Rothschild on the firm’s blog, On The Radar The Insider Trading Cartoon Series, Vol. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 5:30 pm
Today, Mark Connot and Jason Zummo have a good one on drone operators. [read post]
6 Sep 2017, 3:33 am
"Finally, turning to a comparison of the marks at issue, the Board found the critical distinction to be the difference in connotation and commercial impression. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 3:33 am
It found the word "Buffalo" to be the dominant portion of registrant's marks, both because of its prominence as the first word in the mark and because "bucks" has a descriptive connotation in connection with gaming devices.Applicant lamely argued that, in use, the marks are displayed differently, but of course that was irrelevant, since the Board must consider these two standard character marks without reference to any style, color, font size, or other… [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 2:58 am
" The connotations and overall commercial impressions of the two marks "are more different than they are similar. [read post]
31 Mar 2022, 3:53 am
The Board found the marks to be "quite similar" in appearance, sound, connotation and commercial impression. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 3:45 am
" In short, "the marks have their own unique connotations that project separate meanings and distinct commercial impressions. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 3:26 am
This evidence led to the conclusion that "Face" is the dominant element of both marks.And so the Board concluded that the marks are more similar than dissimilar in appearance, sound, connotation, and commercial impression.Finally, Facebook submitted the results of a likelihood of confusion survey, again conducted by Dr. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 3:40 am
" Thus the marks differ in connotation. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 3:24 pm
It concluded that the letters in both marks would be thought of as arbitrary combinations with particular connotations. [read post]
23 May 2014, 3:03 am
The opposed mark does not share that connotation, and overall the marks create different commercial impressions. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:39 pm
The examiner and the Intellectual Property Tribunal both refused the application: they considered that the words "pimp" and "ride" both had suggestive sexual connotations and that the mark, construed as a whole, could be perceived as meaning 'to pimp a prostitute'.On appeal to the Patent Court Viacom argued that the mark, whether taken as a whole or bit by bit, did not contravene public order or morality, particular for Korean consumers who… [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 3:49 am
"[W]e find that BRUNO AND THE HOOLIGANS is more similar than dissimilar to the mark THE HOOLIGANS in terms of appearance, sound, connotation, and commercial impression. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 2:49 am
" The Board consequently found that the letters "V" "S" are the the dominant feature of applicant’s mark, and so the the involved marks "are far more similar than dissimilar in sound, appearance, connotation and commercial impression. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 3:23 am
Petitioner’s mark connotes an ordinary donkey, while Respondent’s mark connotes "a whimsical, that is, a drunken donkey. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 6:49 am
ed.] and to many consumers would not connote anything. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 2:55 am
In applicant's mark, however, GUILTY OF EVERYTHING appears to be arbitrary and distinctive, and is of at least equal prominence to the word GOE.As a result, when the marks GUILTY OF EVERYTHING GOE and [the cited mark] presented in its very specific design format are viewed in their entireties, they are more dissimilar than similar in appearance and sound and convey different connotations, namely, that Applicant’s mark acknowledges and… [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 3:16 am
" The Board noted that in cases involving products that are ordered orally at a bar or restaurant, the sound of the marks is of heightened importance.As to connotation, the Board found that a substantial number of consumers will simply take the marks as they are, without ascribing any meaning to them. [read post]
