Search for: "Mark Gibbons" Results 121 - 140 of 295
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2010, 7:06 pm by Solangel Maldonado
Prior to joining Seton Hall in 2004, Professor Jeffries was a Gibbons Fellow in Public Interest and Constitutional Litigation at Gibbons P.C., where he worked on a variety of cases including matters involving special education, voting rights and affordable housing. [read post]
18 May 2008, 8:15 am
Results: Nevada Supreme Court Highest retention vote: Mark Gibbons 86% Lowest retention vote: Nancy Saitta 45% 8th Judicial District - Civil and Criminal Highest retention votes: David Barker 92% Stewart Bell 91% Allan Earl 90% Mark Denton 88% Douglas Herndon 88% David Wall 88% Lowest retention votes: Donald Mosley 56% Michelle Leavitt 56% Kathy Hardcastle 54% Lee Gates 43% Jessie Walsh 41% Elizabeth Halverson 8% 8th Judicial District - Family Highest retention votes:… [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 10:46 am by Charlotte Howells and Scott J. Etish
The dispute arose from alleged trademark infringement claims involving electronic cigarettes with confusingly similar marks. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 10:32 am by Gregg Settembrino
The District Court of Maryland Holds Evidence Failed Rule 37(e)’s “Intent to Deprive” Requirement appeared first on Gibbons Law Alert. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 10:32 am by Gregg Settembrino
The District Court of Maryland Holds Evidence Failed Rule 37(e)’s “Intent to Deprive” Requirement appeared first on Gibbons Law Alert. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 10:46 am by Charlotte Howells and Scott J. Etish
The dispute arose from alleged trademark infringement claims involving electronic cigarettes with confusingly similar marks. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 10:46 am by Charlotte Howells and Scott J. Etish
The dispute arose from alleged trademark infringement claims involving electronic cigarettes with confusingly similar marks. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 10:32 am by Gregg Settembrino
The District Court of Maryland Holds Evidence Failed Rule 37(e)’s “Intent to Deprive” Requirement appeared first on Gibbons Law Alert. [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 2:02 pm by Carter Wood
The court, in a 6-1 decision written by Justice Mark Gibbons, said it did not overlook any material facts or misapply the law. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 5:10 pm by Colin O'Keefe
" - New Jersey attorney Mark Tabakman of Fox Rothschild in their Wage & Hour - Development & Highlights Blog Tips for Talking to the Media About Your Law Practice - Law marketing consultant Elizabeth Ferris on her Authentic Law Marketing Blog Shooting Guns in the Air a Bad Idea? [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 5:05 pm
As we’ve noted, Paul Weiss’s Mark Pomerantz (Harvard, Michigan Law) was assigned to be the receiver in the Dreier case, while Richards Kibbe & Orbe’s Lee Richards (Amherst, Columbia Law) is the receiver in the Madoff case, with Gibbons’s Irving Picard (UPenn, Boston U. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm by Saba Mengesha
Gibbons proposes both federal and state reforms. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 3:06 pm
" Mark Woods, deputy director of the state Division of Parole and Probation, said his officers always have closely checked residences of sex offenders. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 9:25 am by David Lat
(By the way, perhaps the term “judge” should be in quotation marks; she’s a mere ALJ.) [read post]
The post NJ Seeks to Expand Reach of the Spill Act in PCB Contamination Suit Against Monsanto and Others appeared first on Gibbons Law Alert. [read post]
The post NJ Seeks to Expand Reach of the Spill Act in PCB Contamination Suit Against Monsanto and Others appeared first on Gibbons Law Alert. [read post]
The post NJ Seeks to Expand Reach of the Spill Act in PCB Contamination Suit Against Monsanto and Others appeared first on Gibbons Law Alert. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 12:00 am
I was interested to read in a newsletter from flexicover insurance, that there has been a marked increase in the sale of cruise holidays but with prices as low as 400.00, it's hardly surprising. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 8:04 am by Mark S. Sidoti and Jessica A. Huse
In a decision that marks only the second time a Federal Circuit Court of Appeals has addressed the parameters of website accessibility claims based on the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA), a majority of the panel held that websites are not “places of public accomodation” under Title III of the ADA and thus, the plaintiff’s inability to access certain services provided by Winn-Dixie’s website is not a violation of Title III. [read post]