Search for: "Mark S Rogers"
Results 121 - 140
of 2,154
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2023, 11:54 am
”[19] The Supreme Court emphasized that its opinion was narrow and that “[o]n infringement, we hold only that Rogers does not apply when the challenged use of a mark is as a mark” and [o]n dilution, we hold only that the noncommercial exclusion does not shield parody or other commentary when its use of a mark is similarly source-identifying. [read post]
7 May 2020, 11:00 am
Rogers Test - ThresholdThe greeting cards derive from Chris Gordon's viralvideo, The Crazy Nastyass Honey BadgerOutlined in Rogers v. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 4:37 pm
Like all of our newsletters, it's free. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 4:37 pm
Like all of our newsletters, it's free. [read post]
20 Apr 2020, 4:08 am
Friday’s decision marked the end of this six-year legal battle. [read post]
7 Mar 2019, 4:20 am
He explains why he thinks the answer is no.Ted finds a number of TTAB decisions to be of interest, and particularly the Board's refusal to recuse itself in a cancellation proceeding involving registrations for the mark TRUMP, in which registrations the President has an interest. [read post]
16 May 2022, 12:50 pm
“Doe’s Instagram posts appear to constitute expressive work under Rogers as the posts communicated messages that mocked [ASU’s] policies and administration. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 7:16 am
And, we expect that more than a few will try to leave a mark on this debate in the near term and prior to judicial resolution. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 11:40 pm
" [It wasn't a Tinker to Evers to Chance double play, but Hairston-Grendel-Rogers]. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 10:00 am
By Eric Goldman Roger Cleveland Golf Co. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 8:07 am
In particular, the 9th Circuit’s held that for the First Amendment protections to apply “the mark must both relate to the defendant’s work and the defendant must add his own artistic expression beyond that represented by the mark. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 6:43 am
The court of appeals affirms, on Rogers v. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 8:11 am
So, we have been pestering, I think that's a fair verb, probably how they would characterize my e-mails, we have been pestering them for marked exhibits in the wake of Your Honor's ruling before and since. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 2:14 pm
Here's his pic: Tommy Beardmore, the "mousy" "legal assistant" "Roger" I dunno 'bout mousy. [read post]
23 May 2018, 11:46 am
Previously, the district court relied on a footnote in Rogers indicating that the Second Circuit wouldn’t apply Rogers to confusingly similar titles. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 4:17 am
On June 28 2008, the Canadian Human Rights commission dismissed the complaint against Maclean’s magazine (Rogers Media) concerning an article by Mark Steyn, and rightly so. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 11:32 am
by Roger Alford The ABA's International Lawyer Year-in-Review has just been published and as always it is a monumental achievement. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 8:19 am
That’s not a threshold for the Rogers test, as E.S.S. demonstrated when it applied Rogers to the Play Pen strip clup in L.A. despite the fact that the mark had “little cultural significance. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 9:34 pm
Hylton Louis Kaplow Dennis Carlton and Mark Israel Roger Blair and Christina DePasquale Judd E. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 6:30 pm
Here, the court found that VIP’s use of the mark was as a source identifier. [read post]
