Search for: "Marks v. USA" Results 121 - 140 of 1,906
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The district court’s denial of a preliminary injunction was affirmed (Sunless, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Rivera’s Interamerican Consulting was sued by PDV USA, a Delaware-based affiliate of Venezuelan-owned Citgo. [read post]
In addition, even though the Ninth Circuit affirmed dismissal for lack of likelihood of confusion, it also concluded that the district court erred in adopting a rule excluding any consideration of a senior user’s post-infringement use of the mark and erred in certain aspects of its analysis, including how the court weighed strength of the mark and Bacardi’s intent (Lodestar Anstalt v. [read post]
Justice Sotomayor filed an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part, in which Justice Breyer joined (Iancu v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 4:58 am by Emma Snell
The exercises mark an escalation in threats over Pelosi’s potential visit to Taiwan later this week. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Investigators have received phone records of key officials and aides in the Trump administration, including his former chief of staff, Mark Meadows. [read post]
The Federal Circuit also agreed with the Board that a likelihood of confusion would result from an applicant’s registration of LEHMAN BROTHERS for alcohol and dining services (Tiger Lily Ventures Ltd. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
But the decision marked a partial victory for each side over a subpoena issued in 2019 by the House Oversight Committee to Trump’s accounting firm, Mazars USA. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:08 pm by Public Employment Law Press
"To establish an occupational disease, the claimant must demonstrate a recognizable link between his or her condition and a distinctive feature of his or her employment[, and] the Board's decision as to whether to classify a certain medical condition as an occupational disease is a factual determination that will not be disturbed if supported by substantial evidence" (Matter of Urdiales v Durite Concepts Inc/Durite USA, 199 AD3d 1214, 1214 [2021] [internal quotation… [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:08 pm by Public Employment Law Press
"To establish an occupational disease, the claimant must demonstrate a recognizable link between his or her condition and a distinctive feature of his or her employment[, and] the Board's decision as to whether to classify a certain medical condition as an occupational disease is a factual determination that will not be disturbed if supported by substantial evidence" (Matter of Urdiales v Durite Concepts Inc/Durite USA, 199 AD3d 1214, 1214 [2021] [internal quotation… [read post]