Search for: "Marshall v. State of Michigan" Results 121 - 140 of 262
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2013, 7:40 am by Mary Dwyer
  Michigan Department of Community Health v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 3:45 pm by Lyle Denniston
If anything, the decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 2:08 pm by Jeff Gamso
*Less well known than O'Connor's opening, less well known than they should be,  are the opening paragraphs of Harry Blackmun's dissenting opinion (joined by Marshall and Stevens).Federalism; comity; state sovereignty; preservation of state resources; certainty: the majority methodically inventories these multifarious state interests before concluding that the plain-statement rule of Michigan v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
John's University School of LawKatherine Schostok, DePaul University College of LawAllison Winnike, University of Houston Law Center 5:00 – 7:00 PM Welcome Reception – Henson Atrium, Georgia State Law Friday, June 9, 20177:30 – 8:15 AM Registration & Breakfast – Henson Atrium, Georgia State Law 8:15 – 8:30 AM Opening Remarks – Ceremonial Courtroom, Georgia State LawWendy Hensel, Interim Dean and Professor of Law, Georgia… [read post]
28 Aug 2022, 8:06 am by John Floyd
Louisiana: Overturned 1986 ruling in Michigan v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 6:03 am by Derek T. Muller
-Portland 1.72 $93,755 $54,500 Florida State Univ. 1.73 $81,159 $47,000 Univ. of Notre Dame 1.73 $130,589 $75,500 Univ. of Washington-Seattle 1.74 $109,405 $63,000 Univ. at Buffalo 1.75 $90,928 $52,100 Univ. of California-Irvine 1.75 $119,986 $68,700 Univ. of Akron Main 1.75 $73,756 $42,200 Michigan State Univ. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 1:40 pm by Mark Walsh
Although the postal service has been declared a non-person, today’s decision cannot detract from the federal agency’s heartwarming role in the landmark case of State of New York v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
For the fairly obvious reason that in each case, the first certiorari question is whether the Court should overrule Grutter v. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
In last week’s Supreme Court ruling in Patchak v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 6:41 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Judge Barrett was a member of a panel affirming by unpublished opinion an appeal brought by a Native prisoner in Wisconsin state prison, Schlemm v Carr. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Health Reform Erin Fuse Brown, Georgia State University College of Law, Could States Do Single-Payer? [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 11:59 am by Susan Brenner
The Defendant cites two state court cases, McMillen v. [read post]