Search for: "Marshall v. York" Results 121 - 140 of 1,201
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2010, 6:41 am by Brian Shiffrin
People v Black (_ NY3d_, 2010 NY Slip Op 08766 [11/3010]) is one of the four cases with Batson issues that the Court considered in People v Hecker. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 6:22 pm
Matter of McGillicuddy’s Tap House, Ltd. v New York State Liquor Authority This Article 78 proceeding was brought about to review a determination of the New York State Liquor Authority finding petitioner McGillicuddy’s Tap House in violation of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law. [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 6:19 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The City of New York appeals the verdict, but the Court of Appeals affirms, and the plaintiffs get their money.The case is Marshall v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 7:59 am by Sheldon Toplitt
Wainwright, that found the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments mandated states appoint counsel for indigent criminal defendants, Make No Law, concerning the New York Times v. [read post]
16 May 2007, 10:33 pm
Sharpe and Brown v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 8:14 am by Marshall Hogan
  We'll be monitoring this case in our database entry, T&J Towing v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 3:56 pm by Norm Pattis
 My hope was to poke my head in on the trial of State v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 2:18 pm by Hanni Fakhoury
And Justice Thurgood Marshall noted “privacy is not a discrete commodity, possessed absolutely or not at all. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 8:36 pm
” by two librarians from the John Marshall School of Law, Raizel Liebler  and June Liebert. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 7:17 am by Andrew Hamm
Commentary and coverage focus on the Supreme Court’s decision last week to review New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 12:32 am by John Diekman
Practice point: As a general rule, a defendant has no duty to control the conduct of third-parties.Student note: There is no bright-line rule in New York as to whether a mental health care provider treating a patient on a voluntary basis owes a duty of care to the general public.Case: Fox v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 3:27 am by Rick Hills
The most appropriate limit on Congress' enumerated powers was stated 193 years ago by Chief Justice John Marshall in McCulloch v. [read post]