Search for: "Martin v. Music" Results 121 - 140 of 245
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2015, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
United States A Washington D.C based band is suing YouTube, after the website removed its music video. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 1:44 am
  * Blurred Lines: sound-alike litigation in the music industry While the copyright dispute involving Robin Thicke and Marvin Gaye [see here and here] is entering the trial phase, Tom sinks his paws in the world of infringement in the music industries, between occasional similarities and copies that go beyond mere coincidence. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 2:50 pm by Barry Sookman
Mayfair Music Publications Inc., 2014 ONSC 4806 Cultural Industries Development Corporation (SODEC) c. [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/6YyfKMRmiC -> No Personal Jurisdiction Over Nasty Facebook Post–Burdick v. [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 10:47 am by Barry Sookman
In Martin Blomqvist v Rolex SA, [2014] EUECJ C-98/13 (06 February 2014), the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) held that a pirated good is distributed in a member State when it is purchased online from a non-member State and shipped from another non-member State into a member State. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
The “Sun Six” trial at Kingston Crown Court – we have had regular posts on this Martin Hickman (courtesy of Hacked Off). [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 9:57 am by Ben
Many of the illustrations in this series were by Harry Wingfield and Martin Aitchison. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 1:00 pm by David Markus
  Here's Judge Jordan, for the Court (Jordan, Martin, & Baylson) in U.S. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 9:09 am by library
Martin, 532 U.S. 661 (2001) or Justice Souter wearing a gold chain to symbolize his role in Campbell v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 12:51 am
The Ninth Circuit arguably erred because, while relying on the US Supreme Court’s decision in Campbell v Acuff-Rose Music (92-1292), 510 US 569 (1994), it overlooked the part of  Campbellin which the majority stated that the defence of fair use may apply to a satire if “there is little or no risk of market substitution [of the original work with the later work], whether because of the large extent of transformation of the earlier work, . . . [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 9:21 am
Armed with this registered right, he brought proceedings in which he sought relief for, among other things, infringement of the trade mark in respect of(i) Turner's use of 'Martin Turner's Wishbone Ash' as the name of his band, which provided live and recorded musical performances, and  (ii) Turner's use of a domain name www.wishboneash.co.uk. [read post]