Search for: "Martinez v. Department of Justice"
Results 121 - 140
of 201
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2017, 11:09 am
Martinez, 407 S.W.3d 669, 673 (Mo. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
GUADALUPE ADRIANA MARTINEZ, BRYAN POWERS, AND LEMUEL LOPEZ; from Hidalgo County; 13th district (13-06-00386-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 03-08-07)07-0842 VICTOR HADDAD, M.D. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 8:00 am
Mando Martinez that would probably do more to improve conditions in private jails than any regulatory reform: It would void private jail contracts unless the county enters into the contract in a collective bargaining agreement between the county and sheriff's department employees. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 12:53 pm
THE OPINION REVERSING THE SAN ANTONIO COURT OF APPEALSWAS AUTHORED BY JUSTICE GREEN First two pages of Tex. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 6:08 am
Second Department To find a marital contract unconscionable, two elements must be shown: procedural unconscionability, and substantive unconscionability In Cilento v Cilento, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2020 WL 4661442, 2020 N.Y. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 10:27 am
I quote Justice Kennedy's concurring opinion above on the "narrower grounds" rationale of Marks v. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 6:26 am
” Briefly: In his Sidebar column for the New York Times, Adam Liptak focuses on a single sentence in Justice Ginsburg’s opinion in Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
3 May 2012, 8:01 am
The joint Department of Justice and HHS Medicare Fraud Strike Force is a multi-agency team of federal, state, and local investigators designed to combat Medicare fraud. [read post]
21 Feb 2009, 4:57 am
., the Supreme Court will hear Rivera v. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 4:29 pm
A Justice Department statement is here. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 7:39 am
Coton v. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 9:01 pm
In 2000, the Supreme Court decided Mitchell v. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 3:48 am
The cancer has now metastasized, from the mind of Lhamon to the prosecutorial force of the Department of Justice. [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 4:23 am
Martinez, where three justices of the Court opined that interrogating a suspect under extreme pain or fear doesn't shock the conscience if the police had a good reason, doesn't go as far - because, after all, three justices are only three justices. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 9:12 am
In Papish v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 8:53 am
The Justice Department, in response, did not object; it repeated the modified question as Yates’s filing put it. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 11:45 pm
Leyva-Martinez: The Court affirmed Mr. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 3:00 am
Here's SCOTUSblog's coverage of the issue:The Justices agreed to hear an appeal by the federal government in United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 10:52 am
The UK Committee on Standards in Public Life has suggestedthat Brexit presents an opportunity to depart from the Directive. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 10:52 am
The UK Committee on Standards in Public Life has suggestedthat Brexit presents an opportunity to depart from the Directive. [read post]
