Search for: "Martinez v. Ins*"
Results 121 - 140
of 1,203
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Nov 2021, 10:22 am
The standard of proof is not stringent, amounting only to some firsthand confirmation of the facts" (Joosten v Gale, 129 AD2d 531, 535 [1st Dept 1987]; see Martinez v Reiner, 104 AD3d 477, 478 [1st Dept 2013]; Beltre v Babu, 32 AD3d 722, 723 [1st Dept 2006]). [read post]
20 Nov 2021, 7:29 am
¹ Websites as public accommodations in the Second Circuit In Martinez v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 7:00 am
Arteaga-Martinez (Jan. 11): Whether a non-citizen who is detained under 8 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 3:30 am
On a motion to dismiss a cause of action pursuant to CPLR 3211(a), the court must accept the facts as alleged in the complaint as true, accord the plaintiff the benefit of every possible favorable inference, and determine only whether the facts as alleged fit within any cognizable legal theory (see CPLR 3026; Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88). [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 8:35 am
Martinez (2010). [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 8:35 am
Martinez (2010). [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 11:14 am
Martinez, 561 U.S. 661, 680 (2010). [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 4:30 am
Giving plaintiff 'the benefit of all favorable inferences which may be drawn from [the] pleading,' this Court determines only whether the alleged facts "fit within any cognizable legal theory' (Campaign for Fiscal Equity v State of New York, 86 NY2d 307, 318 [1995], quoting Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]). [read post]
15 Oct 2021, 4:30 am
Giving plaintiff 'the benefit of all favorable inferences which may be drawn from [the] pleading,' this Court determines only whether the alleged facts "fit within any cognizable legal theory' (Campaign for Fiscal Equity v State of New York, 86 NY2d 307, 318 [1995], quoting Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]). [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am
District Court for the District of Colorado Martinez v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am
District Court for the District of Colorado Martinez v. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 1:09 pm
Co. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 12:51 pm
In June, the Supreme Court announced that it would hear Federal Bureau of Investigation v. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
In Shelby County v. [read post]
26 Aug 2021, 4:16 pm
" Martinez v. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 11:57 am
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit that gave one death row inmate a new hearing and required a new trial for another, the justices will weigh in on the impact of their 2012 decision in Martinez v. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 3:50 am
Well, Greg, since my last inspiration was so depressing. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 6:01 am
Masuda, Roman Martinez, Elizabeth Deeley, and Joseph Hansen. [read post]
17 Jul 2021, 7:31 am
Winn-Dixie Reviewing the Americans With Disabilities Act’s Application to Websites–Martinez v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 5:01 am
FCC, which upheld a statute that required cable systems to carry over-the-air broadcasters; and Rumsfeld v. [read post]
