Search for: "Mary Doe Corporation"
Results 121 - 140
of 1,274
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Oct 2022, 9:53 am
Caveat emptor, however, does not manifest itself in a vacuum. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 8:12 am
Lott, Mary L. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 4:25 am
Notably, it does not require that the defendant act in bad faith to personally profit from usurping the opportunity—one of the elements that Justice Schecter found lacking in Shatz. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
National/Federal A Record Number of Black Candidates for Higher Offices Aim to Reshape U.S. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 6:00 am
The leading effort is being headed by WhistleblowersUK and several members of the Parliament, including Mary Robinson. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 3:00 am
The defense team does not participate. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
It does not prosecute individuals for ethics violations. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 1:32 pm
A joint venture between Guatemala and the Guatemalan subsidiary of US company (“GuataJV”, organized as a corporation) plans to build a factory in a rural area of Guatemala. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 8:57 am
While ComplexDiscovery regularly highlights this information, it does not assume any responsibility for content assertions. [read post]
20 Aug 2022, 11:47 am
Matthieu Burnay, Queen Mary University of London Panel 5 Legal Aspects of China’s Belt and Road Initiative The BRI--how the SPC Serves National Strategies and its Institutional Agenda. [read post]
8 Aug 2022, 6:21 pm
Richard and Mary Eshelman Faculty Scholar Professor of Law and International Affairs Pennsylvania State University | 239 Lewis Katz Building, University Park, PA 16802 1.814.863.3640 (direct) || lcb11@psu.edu ABSTRACT: This contribution considers the challenges for semiotics, for the understanding of the conditions of meaning in relation to the human that is posed by a global obsession with the control of reality and its instrumentalization through the… [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
Finding free exercise violations more readily than did its predecessors, the Roberts Court elides the belief/practice distinction dating back to Reynolds.9Requiring closely-held for-profit corporations to provide no-cost contraceptives to female employees under the Affordable Care Act places a high burden on the owners’ free exercise, in violation of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.[9]The City of Philadelphia violates the free exercise clause by denying Catholic Social Services… [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Stephen Buyer with insider trading, accusing him of abusing his role as a corporate consultant to exploit nonpublic information and collect more than $300,000 in illegal profits. [read post]
29 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
Growing out of UN Sustainable Development Goal 16, the Pathfinders for Peaceful, Just and Inclusive Societies’ global justice agenda, and other global access to justice initiatives and efforts,[14] shared international goals include empowering people and communities and building a just, equitable, tolerant, open and inclusive world.[15] An important part of advancing this agenda is to make a business case based on cost-benefit analyses demonstrating the positive impacts of providing access to… [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 4:00 am
No such entity called SPH Medical exists in Arizona, according to corporate filings. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 5:54 am
Does he have any concept of truth as that term is used in our society? [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 6:56 pm
One does not speak here of zero sum binaries. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 12:41 pm
Nonetheless, a framework style agreement, just like the throwback exercise that is the old UN Norms on the Responsibilities of Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises with Regard to Human Rights (‘the Norms’) in an OEIGWG Draft bottle, would face challenges. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 9:52 am
Even though the Decisis website does not mention LexisNexis, the OSBA site does. [read post]
27 Jun 2022, 4:47 am
In Sebrow v Sebrow (205 AD3d 563 [1st Dept 2022]), the Appellate Division ruled: The documentary evidence on the motion to dismiss established that plaintiff is not a shareholder of Worbes Corporation and thus does not have standing to bring either individual or derivative claims. [read post]
