Search for: "Matter of Appointment of a Special Judge" Results 121 - 140 of 2,789
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2023, 7:39 am by Russell Knight
Remove all doubt from your divorce judge and ask them for permission to allow the Appellate court to weigh in on the matter. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 6:05 am by Alan Neff
When McGahn failed and Sessions appointed Special Counsel Robert Mueller, Trump reportedly “erupted in anger” and asked, “Where’s my Roy Cohn? [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 5:49 am by Chip Merlin
I noted that: In this case, the judge appointed an umpire who had been appointed before as an umpire and as a special master on a number of other cases. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 12:11 pm by lawjtlg
The law firm of Johnston Tomei Lenczycki & Goldberg, LLC offers complimentary consultations on all family law matters. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 8:29 am by Sasha Volokh
Vuitton et Fils S.A., a party was thought to have violated an injunction, so the court granted the opposing party's attorney's request to be appointed as special counsel to represent the government in investigating and prosecuting a criminal contempt action. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:28 am by Ronald Mann
The justices said not a word about the second challenge, and they made only one offhand comment about the third challenge, when Justice Brett Kavanaugh suggested in passing that the administrative law judges’s appointments won’t pass muster with him. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 2:05 pm by Chip Merlin
In this case, the judge appointed an umpire who had been appointed before as an umpire and as a special master on a number of other cases. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 11:02 am by Tom Joscelyn
Although it is not clear if Chesebro will be charged federally, his conduct will in any event be a key part of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s trial of Trump. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 7:27 am by Sasha Volokh
Now suppose Congress creates specialized Article III courts and gives them jurisdiction over cases where plaintiffs lack standing, or that fall outside the Article III jurisdictional categories. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"[A]lthough Civil Service Law §§75 and 76 generally govern police disciplinary procedures, preexisting laws that expressly provide for control of police discipline were 'grandfathered' under Civil Service Law §76 (4), which provides that nothing in sections 75 and 76 'shall be construed to repeal or modify any general, special or local' laws or charters" (See Matter of City of Schenectady v New York State Pub. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"[A]lthough Civil Service Law §§75 and 76 generally govern police disciplinary procedures, preexisting laws that expressly provide for control of police discipline were 'grandfathered' under Civil Service Law §76 (4), which provides that nothing in sections 75 and 76 'shall be construed to repeal or modify any general, special or local' laws or charters" (See Matter of City of Schenectady v New York State Pub. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 9:00 am by Sasha Volokh
  This can raise Article I Nondelegation Doctrine issues if the incorporation is dynamic, i.e., if the rules are binding no matter how they might change in the future. [read post]
23 Nov 2023, 10:41 am by Russell Knight
The control of said assets may require some level of expertise beyond a judge merely issuing you temporary control of those assets. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 1:40 pm by Tom Joscelyn
“Near the end of the photo op, I had a back and forth with President Trump when the matter of Arizona came up,” Chesebro is quoted as saying in his proffer. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 4:21 am by Peter J. Sluka
”  Citing the merger clause in the employment agreement, United States Magistrate Judge Gabriel W. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 9:00 pm by Michael C. Dorf
So too, some judges sit from time to time in regions outside of their usual appointment. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 4:28 am by Mark Graber
  Judge Emmons charged the grand jury that “[t]he oath which shall have been taken need not be in the precise words of the amendment” “To support the Constitution of the United States. [read post]