Search for: "Matter of Brien E."
Results 121 - 140
of 160
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2018, 4:18 pm
For example, “[w]e have extensive procedures and controls that are designed to identify and address conflicts of interest,” and “[o]ur clients’ interests always come first. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 1:10 pm
Fox, Rothschild, O’Brien & Frankel, 20 F.3d 1250, 1261 (3d Cir. 1994). [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 4:57 am
(e) true threats . . . and (f) speech integral to criminal conduct. . . [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 4:28 pm
The DLA Piper “Privacy Matters” blog has a post entitled “The Netherlands – DPA imposes €830,000 fine for access requests fees”. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 4:59 pm
” Judge Diana E. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 4:41 am
E.U. foreign policy chief Josep Borrell has invited Philippe Lazzarini, commissioner of the U.N. agency for Palestine Refugees, to discuss matters as countries suspend funding to the aid agency while the U.N. investigates allegations of its staff members’ ties to Hamas. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 7:06 pm
"All three of the trial court judges in Lafayette County Circuit Court recused themselves on the matter of Jones v. [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 4:35 pm
The matter is listed for a 3 day trial commencing on 7 December 2020. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am
Recent cases citing these rights together include Watson v Campos [2016] IEHC 18 (14 January 2016) [28] (Barrett J); Rooney v Shell E&P Ireland [2017] IEHC 63 (20 January 2017) [31]-[32] (Ní Raifeartaigh J); Ryanair v Channel 4 Television [2017] IEHC 651 (05 October 2017) [49]-[52] (Meenan J). [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 1:12 am
Relevantly, clause 23 included the following: ‘23.1 A party must not commence court proceedings in respect of a dispute arising out of this agreement (“Dispute”), including without limitation a dispute regarding any breach or purported breach of this agreement, interpretation of any of its provisions, any matters concerning of parties’ performance or observance of its obligations under this agreement, or the termination or the right of a party to terminate this… [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Do Critics of Police Have the First Amendment Procedural Protections That Nazis Get?
22 Jan 2021, 8:26 am
" Bey at ¶44 (citing O'Brien v. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 1:52 pm
[Serial-blogging my recent article in the Journal of Free Speech Law] Previously, I blogged the abstract, introduction, Part I, and Part II of my new article, Taxing Nudity: Discriminatory Taxes, Secondary Effects, and Tiers of Scrutiny, which has just been published in the Journal of Free Speech Law. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 7:27 am
Goffer, his brother, Emanuel, and a third defendant, Michael Kimelman, conspired with attorneys Arthur Cutillo and Brien Santarlas, (formerly of the Ropes & Gray law firm) and others. [read post]
27 May 2011, 7:32 am
For those of you attending LSA next week, or if you're in SF nonetheless, please note that below the fold is information regarding the 10 panels making up the "crimprof" shadow conference. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 6:07 pm
In a recent decision involving claims that baby foods allegedly containing trace metals cause autism, a California trial judge shouted “not my job”[9]: “Under California law, the interpretation of epidemiological data — especially data reported in peer-reviewed, published articles — is generally a matter of professional judgment outside the trial court’s purview, including the interpretation of the strengths and weaknesses of a study’s design.… [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 6:06 am
Not the forced expulsion of a group from territory, nor – as numerous scholars have argued – the destruction of the myriad social, cultural, historical and religious elements that together define a “group” (see this discussion by Melanie O’Brien). [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 2:49 pm
The Second Circuit held that the trial evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to prove that Countrywide made a false representation with contemporaneous fraudulent intent. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 5:01 am
And in O'Brien v. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Michael E. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 5:02 pm
JurisdictionThe Court has jurisdiction over this matter under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
