Search for: "Matter of Bright" Results 121 - 140 of 5,248
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2024, 3:30 am by Liz Dunshee
He makes this prediction, which doesn’t seem too far-fetched (especially for SPACs that hold “investment securities”): As a practical matter, when faced with such strong language, issuers and their legal counsels will need to weigh the risk that the bright line duration limits set forth in the guidance will be used as a basis to bring enforcement actions. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm by Richard J. Pierce, Jr.
Loper Bright accurately characterizes my position in its brief. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 9:20 am by Mark Ashton
In olden days, we called the matter one of incompetency and you were either “competent” or not. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 12:46 pm by Kevin
Here’s another potential bright-line rule: does any substantial evidence show defense counsel was audibly snoring? [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 8:52 pm by Mark Ashton
The vast majority of Americans who own guns profess to doing so as a matter of self-protection. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 3:30 am by Nicholas Bagley
I’ve got an article at The Atlantic about the arguments in Relentless and Loper-Bright. [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
To be clear, no provision of the Investment Company Act or any rule adopted by the Commission establishes a bright line duration beyond which an entity triggers investment company status concerns under section 3(a)(1)(A). [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 5:50 am by Michael C. Dorf
Dept. of Commerce and Loper Bright Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 11:22 am by David Klein
It will be interesting to see if the FCC adopts the AGs’ proposed bright line approach. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
The truth of the matter is when you strike a juror there is a whole combination of reasons why a lawyer strikes a juror. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 5:24 am by Kevin LaCroix
As discussed in detail in a January 18, 2024 post on the Cooley law firm’s PubCo blog (here), in two companion cases, Loper Bright Enterprise v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 9:16 am by CMS
It concluded that the grant of the 2007 option was ‘made available’ by Mr Noble’s surrender of his 2006 option and he did not as a matter of fact acquire the 2007 option ‘by reason of his employment’ and accordingly the 2007 option should not be treated as an employment-related securities option. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 6:07 am by SHG
” and features a bright red arrow pointing away from my cart. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 9:30 pm by ernst
The council’s members have diverse views on how history matters to the law. [read post]