Search for: "Matter of Cert. of a Question of Law"
Results 121 - 140
of 1,619
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2023, 1:30 pm
Most of the time, when a state supreme court decides a question of state law, that is the end of the story. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 12:30 pm
Circuit: Boy, that sounds like a tricky question. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 2:26 pm
" The Court didn't reach that question, however, because of its resolution of the other questions presented. [read post]
15 Mar 2023, 7:19 am
., arguing that the settled order included findings that he had violated the securities laws. [read post]
14 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
App. 148, 150, 285 S.E.2d 119, 121 (1981) (upholding indictment that alleged unlawful confinement, restraint, and removal without negating consent), cert. denied, 305 N.C. 397, 290 S.E.2d 367 (1982). [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 9:59 am
As a threshold matter, I'm not even certain the Establishment Clause can be incorporated. [read post]
4 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
Becoming a doctrine is more than just semantics; it is a baptism that matters. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 8:55 am
Becoming a doctrine is more than just semantics; it is a baptism that matters. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 7:20 am
But as a statistical matter, four-time relist City of Ocala, Florida v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 9:27 am
Supervalu Inc., 9 F.4th 455 (7th Cir. 2021), cert. granted, 143 S. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 10:25 am
To me, this is so obvious that I can’t help but question the motivation of those who (often glibly) equate the two. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 10:07 am
The court referred the matter to the local U.S. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 12:33 pm
[The result in Davis is questionable. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 11:58 am
Nearly three years ago, the Supreme Court held that this power to hear legal questions includes the ability to investigate “mixed questions of law and fact. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 8:05 am
When asked if it rained on the day in question, [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
They may simply have misread the case as cert-worthy. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:15 am
Cir. 2016), cert. denied, 137 S. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 6:08 am
The case deals with a novel question about the application of the FSIA to criminal cases, and the scope of its “commercial activities” exception. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
Both understood law, as a conceptual matter, to be rooted in the behaviors and attitudes of relevant constituencies in accepting identifiable texts and sources as somehow authoritative or (for Dworkin) at least presumptively authoritative. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 5:00 am
The cert question in the case is how much of a conversation needs to be law-related for the privilege to apply, but there's a threshold question about what counts as a law-related discussion in the first place. [read post]
