Search for: "Matter of Doe v Kelly"
Results 121 - 140
of 639
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2021, 8:49 am
” Fehr v. [read post]
16 Jan 2021, 10:57 pm
”[32] The parties’ intentions are considered a matter of law, and intent is referred to the trier of fact only if a court determines that the document is ambiguous as a matter of law.[33] Under the objective standard, statements of the parties’ intentions carry the greatest weight.[34] In Teachers Ins. and Annuity Ass’n of America v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 9:05 am
What Does This Mean? [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 8:47 am
Mike Kelly and others: Kelly v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 2:31 pm
From Milanov v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
Also, in Matter of Garnes v Kelly, 2007 NY Slip Op 30262(U); affirmed 51 AD3d 538, the court concluded that a probationary period is extended as the result 0f the employee's disciplinary suspension from his position for off duty misconduct. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 4:00 am
Also, in Matter of Garnes v Kelly, 2007 NY Slip Op 30262(U); affirmed 51 AD3d 538, the court concluded that a probationary period is extended as the result 0f the employee's disciplinary suspension from his position for off duty misconduct. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:45 am
In McNally v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm
The Affordable Care Act (ACA) makes its third trip to the Supreme Court today under the caption California v. [read post]
2 Nov 2020, 9:03 pm
I focus on Hannah v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 4:00 am
R. v. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 7:00 am
See, e.g., Cetacean Community v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 10:00 am
These provided some credible evidence to support the Medical Board's finding that Officer was not disabled at the time of his retirement.Referring to Matter of Khurana v Kelly, 73 AD3d 497, leave to appeal denied 15 NY3d 715, the court held that the Medical Board "was not bound by the contrary opinions of [Officer's] treating physicians. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 10:00 am
These provided some credible evidence to support the Medical Board's finding that Officer was not disabled at the time of his retirement.Referring to Matter of Khurana v Kelly, 73 AD3d 497, leave to appeal denied 15 NY3d 715, the court held that the Medical Board "was not bound by the contrary opinions of [Officer's] treating physicians. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 9:04 pm
Supreme Court’s landmark environmental decision in Michigan v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 6:41 am
In Patterson v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am
Irish constitutional law does indeed subscribe to a hierarchy of rights in some cases (see, eg, People (DPP) v Shaw [1982] IR 1, 63 (Kenny J)); but that is usually unprincipled and largely unworkable (see, eg, Attorney General v X [1992] 1 IR 1, [1992] IESC 1 (5 March 1992) [138]-[139] (McCarthy J), [184] (Egan J); Sunday Newspapers Ltd v Gilchrist and Rogers [2017] IESC 18 (23 March 2017) [36]… [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 4:23 pm
The Facts Kelly Cormier worked for St. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 12:31 pm
” The new bill does not modify either of these sections. [read post]
20 Jul 2020, 7:34 pm
MARK KELLY, Defendant. [read post]
