Search for: "Matter of Doyle" Results 121 - 140 of 491
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2019, 4:25 am by Steve Baird
Incapable matter — subject matter that cannot serve as a trademark — like generic terms and phrases are impossible and hopeless of ever functioning as a valid mark. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 5:56 am
Smith, EY Center for Board Matters, on Friday, January 11, 2019 Tags: Board communication, Board performance, Boards of Directors, Corporate culture, Engagement, Institutional Investors, Risk management, Shareholder activism, Stakeholders Compensation Season 2019 Posted by Adam J. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
The three main grounds for dismissal advanced by Google were that: It could not be considered a publisher of the Images or Web Matter, merely an intermediary; That the Images and/or Web Matter at issue were not defamatory of Mr Trkulja; and That Google was entitled to immunity from suit as a matter of public policy. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
The Mischon de Reya Data Matters Blog has covered the ICO’s fining of organisations for failing to pay the data protection fee, as has Pinsent Masons. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
Mischon de Reya’s Data Matters Blog has considered the issue of data theft in the life sciences industry. [read post]
4 Nov 2018, 6:10 pm by INFORRM
  The trial in this matter will not now be taking place on 5 November 2018. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 6:09 am
Effective Board Evaluation Posted by Steve Klemash, Rani Doyle, and Jamie C. [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Warby J will heard the final day of the libel trial of Doyle v Smith. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 6:02 am
Posted by Steve Klemash, Rani Doyle, and Kellie Heunnekens, EY Center for Board Matters, on Friday, October 26, 2018 Editor's Note: Steve W. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 4:59 pm by INFORRM
The Stanford Cyberlaw Blog has covered the matter of online content regulation and the utility of using the Domain Name System in a regulatory framework. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 2:31 am by Peter Mahler
They also argued that the complaint’s allegations of oppressive conduct by the siblings, while relevant under the statute governing judicial dissolution of a closely held corporation, have no application under § 702 as per cases such as Doyle v Icon and Matter of Kassab. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 10:36 am by MOTP
Riddick, as a matter of law, cannot recover expectancy damages which are only available pursuant to a contract. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 4:48 am by Hon. Richard G. Kopf
Judge Jim Doyle later became our partner as well. [read post]