Search for: "Matter of English v Smith"
Results 121 - 140
of 323
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2018, 4:46 am
It is not generally the role of the court to consider matters of procedure. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 4:45 pm
The seminal case of Coco v A.N. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:29 pm
Retirement Bd. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:29 pm
Retirement Bd. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 5:09 pm
On the same day Warby J will heard the final day of the libel trial of Doyle v Smith. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm
Mishcon de Reya’s Data Matters blog has provided useful context on this matter. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
[Smith v Hager, 185 A.D.2d 612]Demoting an employee for sleeping on duty on two occasions, although a hearing officer found the employee’s supervisor had “condoned” such conduct and the hearing officer had recommended a suspension without pay for three weeks. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 3:11 am
Since PJS, and now also since Sir Cliff Richard v BBC, a new path appears to be being forged for privacy and freedom of expression. [read post]
22 Jun 2018, 11:05 am
In Smith v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 11:00 am
The Supreme Court found that it has long recognized the grant of a patent as a matter involving public rights, citing to the Court’s 1899 decision in United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 4:16 pm
The Transparency Project Blog has considered the implementation of the English Courts modernisation. [read post]
2 Jun 2018, 10:35 am
Smith reflected on the state of democracy and the rule of law in the Trump era. [read post]
7 May 2018, 1:51 pm
For escalate: need subject matter expert to figure out what a PFA is. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 1:47 pm
Both cases involve the process of inter partes review added to the Patent Act in 2012 as part of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 1:29 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 8:08 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
[Smith v Hager, 185 A.D.2d 612]Demoting an employee for sleeping on duty on two occasions, although a hearing officer found the employee’s supervisor had “condoned” such conduct and the hearing officer had recommended a suspension without pay for three weeks. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 9:48 am
First up was Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 7:49 am
The first case of the day will be Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
