Search for: "Matter of Grand Jury Proceedings"
Results 121 - 140
of 1,107
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2020, 7:37 am
” In due course Judge Cox caused the matter to be referred to the grand jury. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 2:18 pm
Pursuant to CPL 190.30 (1), the same rules which govern admission of evidence at criminal drug trials apply to grand jury proceedings, unless covered by an exception listed in CPL 190.30 (2). [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 7:03 am
A grand jury is so named because traditionally it has a greater number of jurors than a trial jury, called a petty jury (from the French word petit meaning `small’).Getting back to Beattie, the Appeals Court began its analysis of his appeal by explaining that`[t]he crime of perjury in a judicial proceeding occurs whenever one “wil[ ]fully swears or affirms falsely in a matter material to the issue or point in question. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 5:08 am
Whatever happened in the grand jury wouldn’t matter. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 10:45 am
Grand juries can be an important check on prosecutors, but proceedings in front of grand juries are not adversarial. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 3:36 pm
Thereafter, the Grand Jury found the instant indictment which, it is conceded, substantially covers the identical subject matter, parties, dates and amounts alleged in the prior indictment (1022/53). [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 8:35 am
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) on September 8, 2011 released the following: "TUCSON, AZ-A federal grand jury returned a 21-count superseding indictment against Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) Special Agent Jovana Deas, 33, of Rio Rico, Arizona and Dana Maria Samaniego Montes, 40, of Agua Prieta, Mexico. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 8:35 am
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) on September 8, 2011 released the following: "TUCSON, AZ-A federal grand jury returned a 21-count superseding indictment against Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) Special Agent Jovana Deas, 33, of Rio Rico, Arizona and Dana Maria Samaniego Montes, 40, of Agua Prieta, Mexico. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 12:00 am
This new law will prevent secretive grand jury proceedings from taking place in the state. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 4:46 pm
However, the Matter of Second Additional Grand Jury of County of Kings, is dispositive of that issue. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 9:49 am
In our experience, a defense lawyer experienced with grand jury investigations can influence the pre-indictment proceedings to the client’s advantage. [read post]
3 May 2018, 3:32 am
Mueller’s investigation came at the Justice Department’s request and a potential subpoena for President Trump would come as part of the grand jury proceedings in that investigation, if the President and his attorneys can’t agree to an interview or believe compelled testimony isn’t appropriate. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 3:38 pm
The Grand Jury found sufficient evidence to indict the defendant and two co-defendants for multiple counts of forgery and grand larceny for having endorsed and cashed New York State employment checks over a three year period. [read post]
9 May 2011, 5:48 am
Although Clements alleges certain improprieties . . . with respect to the grand jury proceedings, he makes no specific allegations that law enforcement officials obtained the indictment through the knowing presentation of false testimony. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 3:20 pm
Read Rick Snyder’s Grand Jury Indictment. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 8:14 pm
If I am trying to confirm the impanelment of a federal grand jury on a particular matter, would I be able to FOIA the DOJ or the FBI for records related to the case? [read post]
13 Dec 2014, 12:00 am
Critics of the chokehold and takedown are right to complain about secret grand jury proceedings. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 1:43 pm
The fact that this has leaked from a Grand Jury proceeding should send up red flags to everyone. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 10:54 am
Lettow, Note, Reviving Federal Grand Jury Presentments, 103 Yale L.J. 1333 (1994) (“A presentment is a charge the grand jury brings on its own initiative. [read post]
18 Jun 2014, 1:19 pm
It is fair to say that there is one witness who may now be available to testify in this proceeding whose testimony was clearly absent from the Family Court matter--the respondent there. [read post]
