Search for: "Matter of Harry v Harry"
Results 121 - 140
of 2,605
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2010, 2:02 pm
For such a short and unanimous opinion, Jones v. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 4:23 am
The case is Harris v. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 1:42 am
Charlotte Harris is a partner at Mishcon de Reya. [read post]
29 Oct 2015, 12:45 pm
We agree with defendants that physician aid-in-dying, and attendant procedures and safeguards against abuse, are matters for the Legislature. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 5:32 am
One of the most venerable cyberlaw questions: is cyberspace a physical place, and does it matter legally? [read post]
22 Mar 2008, 7:55 am
People v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 4:04 pm
Harris [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 11:09 am
SEIU (2012) and Harris v. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 11:43 am
One was taken from June 28th-30th, ending the same day that the court handed down its Hobby Lobby decision (and Harris v Quinn for that matter), and after its previously-announced decisions the week before, and the other from July 5-7, at the pitch of the hysterical overreaction to the 5-4 Hobby Lobby result. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 12:45 pm
You can even require the defendants to prove these allegations as a factual matter. [read post]
27 May 2014, 12:47 am
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation and other companies v Harris and others [2014] EWHC 1568 (Ch), a Chancery Division for England and Wales decision of Mr Justice Barling a couple of weeks ago, is the latest (will it be the last?) [read post]
29 Sep 2024, 4:16 am
Facts do not matter. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 7:13 am
In this recent case (Byer v. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 11:03 am
Facts of the Case In the case of Harris County v. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 11:03 am
Facts of the Case In the case of Harris County v. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 7:59 am
In Shelby County v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 11:42 am
In Harris v. [read post]
15 Jul 2021, 9:35 am
As a technical matter, Chemerinsky and Neuborne are correct that VP Harris could simply "declare the current Senate filibuster rule unconstitutional," but this would also be a futile gesture. [read post]
9 Sep 2008, 8:24 am
The District Court first tried to determine the nature of the Lexicon:"The Lexicon entries cull every item and character that appears in the Harry Potter works, no matter if it plays a significant or insignificant role in the story. [...] [read post]
