Search for: "Matter of Jonathan M." Results 121 - 140 of 1,104
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2023, 12:49 am by Matthias Weller
– A Critical Overview of the Hague Preliminary Draft on Judgments”, Yearbook of Private International Law 17 (2015/2016), pp 1-31 Bonomi, Andrea; Mariottini, Cristina M. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 7:17 am by Daniel Gilman
My ICLE colleagues Dirk Auer, Brian Albrecht, and Jonathan Barnett did too, among others. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
I was, and remain, impressed by Jonathan Still’s essay, published in Ethics, where I thought (and think) that he demonstrated convincingly that the logical entailment of equal voting power was some form of proportional representation. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 8:03 am by centerforartlaw
The MPA has served as an advocate for First Amendment rights, and SAG-AFTRA has argued for the rights of performers, celebrities, their families, and their estates in this matter. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 8:03 am by centerforartlaw
The MPA has served as an advocate for First Amendment rights, and SAG-AFTRA has argued for the rights of performers, celebrities, their families, and their estates in this matter. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 8:28 am by Daniel Gilman
Thom Lambert and Jonathan Barnett both have interesting posts on the matter. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 8:31 am by Sasha Volokh
But I'm working on an article on the broader issue, which I'll probably post here eventually.) [read post]
18 Nov 2022, 4:19 am by Emma Snell
Jonathan Allen and Scott Wong report for NBC News. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 7:19 am by Guest Author
(“No serious congressional scholar believes that Congress speaks clearly when addressing major questions as a descriptive matter. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 3:37 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
What judges say only really matters if it's necessary to resolve an ongoing dispute. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The idea of same-sex marriage would simply not have occurred as a possibility to the Founders, or for that matter to the generations preceding or following them.So is there a way in which Justice Alito’s remark might make more sense, perhaps by focusing on a general analysis of how the law should treat harm, rather than the Harm Principle? [read post]
19 Oct 2022, 4:22 am by Emma Snell
“Resolving the Taiwan question is a matter for the Chinese,” Wenbin added. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 9:11 am by Anna Bower
I’m just here for the violence. [read post]