Search for: "Matter of Kagan"
Results 121 - 140
of 2,763
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2010, 7:22 am
He chose Elena Kagan. [read post]
2 May 2011, 10:14 am
Supreme Court took on a relatively rare original-jurisdiction matter with the case of Montana v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 5:48 pm
Judgment, values, and politics are what matters on the Court. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 8:30 pm
EK: Senator Franken, the most important thing in interpreting any statute, in fact, the only thing that matters is Congress' intent. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 10:24 pm
No matter who he picks, his selection is likely to break down some major barriers. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 7:32 am
" Writes Justice Breyer, joined by Justices Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagan, dissenting from the Supreme Court's summary reversal of the Montana Supreme Court's decision, which — as the majority put it presented the question "whether the holding of Citizens United applies to the Montana state law": There can be no serious doubt that it does. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 7:32 am
" Writes Justice Breyer, joined by Justices Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagan, dissenting from the Supreme Court's summary reversal of the Montana Supreme Court's decision, which — as the majority put it presented the question "whether the holding of Citizens United applies to the Montana state law": There can be no serious doubt that it does. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 7:32 am
" Writes Justice Breyer, joined by Justices Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagan, dissenting from the Supreme Court's summary reversal of the Montana Supreme Court's decision, which — as the majority put it presented the question "whether the holding of Citizens United applies to the Montana state law": There can be no serious doubt that it does. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 6:49 am
Lucky Elena Kagan. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 11:03 am
In the Supreme Court, the only number that truly matters is five. [read post]
19 May 2023, 1:01 am
’” Europe in 1939 via OmniAtlas Although it should have been obvious in the 1920s and ‘30s, Kagan maintains, that the balance of power was shifting away from European democracies in favor of dictatorships, “Americans continued to imagine that what happened in the world was mostly a matter of indifference to them. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 9:26 am
A few points that I hope can wrap things up in a nice neat bow: 1) The only reason Fred Kagan's ideas were able to get any traction at all is because we have a president with an (R) after his name. [read post]
19 May 2008, 8:00 am
In the 1990s, people talked about the "end of history," when international power politics wouldn't really matter. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 4:40 am
One can understand Kagan’s dissent as a matter of principle, a slavish adherence to precedent and judicial modesty, or an admonition that whenever we let our jurisprudence be guided by the current flavor of fear, really bad law comes out of it. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 8:43 am
Distinguishing this case from Flast may seem like a strain, but it's a more a matter of not letting the anomaly grow. [read post]
10 May 2010, 11:40 am
"So back to that Kagan questionnaire. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 8:09 am
The post Argument analysis: Does prejudice matter? [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 5:31 pm
In dissent, Justice Kagan pointed out that Arizona changes polling places so often that it is no small matter to keep up. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 1:40 am
” She did say that the oral arguments do matter. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 8:07 am
As an ethical matter, Justice Clark's decision made sense. [read post]
