Search for: "Matter of Melendez" Results 121 - 140 of 169
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2010, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
Virginia, which was to further explore the ramifications of the Court’s decision at the end of the 2008 term in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 12:42 pm by Nathan
Further elaboration “on the scope of the Second Amendment’s right to bear arms” is sort of going to be necessary, no matter who’s sitting on the Court. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 12:30 pm by Alain Leibman
(To be sure, as discussed in an earlier post, under the Confrontation Clause and Melendez-Diaz, the government could have been required to present live witness testimony about the testing rather than rely on mere reports of the results). [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 8:08 am by Richard D. Friedman
It may be that both sides from Melendez-Diaz are a little wary given the addition of yet another new Justice. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 2:39 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Levinson failed to demonstrate that the plaintiff knew or should have known that Levinson had stopped representing him in the matter more than three years before the action was commenced (cf. [read post]
26 May 2010, 12:58 pm by Jon Sands
The introduction of the CHR violate defendant's confrontation rights under Crawford and under Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 9:10 pm by cdw
” Counsel for petitioner are  Rob Owen (Owen & Roundtree), as well as Skadden Aarps’ attorneys Douglas G Robinson & Maria Cruz Melendez. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am by Tom Goldstein
Supreme Court retirements inevitably produce much more coverage of process than substance. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 12:45 am by Indefensible
But the prosecutor's refusal to permit consideration of a lesser sentence ended the matter, rendering irrelevant all the other factors that should have been considered to arrive at a just sentence. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 8:05 pm by Dwight Sullivan
Have I mentioned that last week I was accused of being obsessed with Melendez-Diaz? [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 9:00 pm
Sure, the requirements of the unavailability of the witness in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 9:00 pm
On the other hand, Melendez-Diaz is so new that it may just be a matter of time for other appellate courts to rule that Melendez-Diaz bars records custodians' certificates without the testimony of such custodians. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 3:22 am by Russ Bensing
  Complicating the matter even further was the fact that even the reinterpreted Virginia statute is no more:  it was amended last August to be fully Melendez-compliant, leaving Scalia, the author of the latter decision, to wonder why the Court had even bothered to hear the case. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 1:43 pm by Lyle Denniston
The Court sat on the case without action, until four days after deciding Melendez-Diaz, then granted review instead of sending it back to Virginia courts to apply Melendez-Diaz. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 9:10 pm
No matter how glorious it may be to successfully brief and argue such exciting cases as Miranda, Loving, and Melendez-Diaz, what matters most to clients is getting good results by any lawful and ethical means necessary, even if it is through the less sexy approach of proving a standing issue and that Younger (401 U.S. (1971)) federal abstention should not apply. [read post]
15 Oct 2009, 12:00 pm
Melendez required his clients to fill out and sign a Notice of Entry of Appearance as Attorney or Representative, which gave him the authority to represent them in court proceedings regarding immigration matters. [read post]