Search for: "Matter of NL"
Results 121 - 140
of 253
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2020, 4:00 am
R. v Parsons, 2020 CanLII 77114 (NL PC) [64] When imposing sentence for the offence of arson it is important not to focus solely on property damage. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 2:48 pm
Whilst it is possible to deal with rent arrears cases in this way, that is only because rent arrears are (usually) a matter of record. [read post]
11 Dec 2018, 5:50 am
The AmeriKat, unfortunately, has yet to attend an EPLAW Congress, coming, as they often do, during an intensely busy court term. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 11:54 pm
The patent in suit had been opposed pursuant to Article 100(a) EPC for lack of novelty (Article 54 EPC) and lack of inventive step (Article 56 EPC), Article 100(b) EPC for insufficiency of disclosure (Article 83 EPC), and Article 100(c) EPC for added matter (Article 123(2) EPC and Article 76(1) EPC).III. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 2:56 pm
Not strictly speaking a housing case, though it is a mortgage repossession matter. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 4:30 pm
Most recently, in the Law Gazette, my esteemed colleague (and occasional NL contributor), David Smith wrote an opinion piece on the prospects and merits of a housing court. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 5:12 am
As a result, I side with JS and against my NL colleague, David Smith; NL's justifiable anger at the drafting of the provisions as interpreted by Tugendhat J in the Draycott case provide an appropriate footnote to the overly self-laudatory comments by Lord Bassam. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 4:29 pm
Suing in the NL still requires jurisdiction so it is not suitable for any lawsuits against any company. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 9:47 am
As NL and I noted, in relation to R (Van Boolen) v London Borough of Barking & Dagenham [2009] EWHC 2196 (Admin) (links to NL's note), there is a bubbling issue about the extent to which allocations policies need to set out all their terms; it'd be interesting to note whether this issue was canvassed before the CA in this case (hint, hint). [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 5:12 am
As a result, I side with JS and against my NL colleague, David Smith; NL's justifiable anger at the drafting of the provisions as interpreted by Tugendhat J in the Draycott case provide an appropriate footnote to the overly self-laudatory comments by Lord Bassam. [read post]
23 Nov 2017, 1:02 am
(…) In signing up to the Protocol on Provisional Application, any given Member State will not only contribute to the collective realization of this crucial reform, but also provide positive signals to investors and enable itself to participate in early decision-making on Court matters. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 9:47 am
As NL and I noted, in relation to R (Van Boolen) v London Borough of Barking & Dagenham [2009] EWHC 2196 (Admin) (links to NL's note), there is a bubbling issue about the extent to which allocations policies need to set out all their terms; it'd be interesting to note whether this issue was canvassed before the CA in this case (hint, hint). [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 12:00 am
The opposition grounds raised were added subject-matter (Art 76 / Art 123(2) EPC), lack of novelty (Art 54 EPC), lack of inventive step (Art 56 EPC) and insufficient disclosure (Art 83 EPC). [read post]
13 Feb 2014, 2:56 pm
One for the settlement supplement advocates are entitled to when a matter settles at IRH. [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 3:27 pm
This is of dubious worth, but no matter, what concerns us here is what followed that announcement. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
It remains a matter of great happiness to the IPKat and Merpel that these posts have been so well received. [read post]
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, Berg v. Kingdom of the Netherlands, Docket No. 20-1765
17 Feb 2022, 3:53 pm
Expropriation Exception Municipal Museums (NL) Lack of Venue? [read post]
1 Feb 2017, 4:51 am
Only 5% of appeals in trade mark matters are successful, which supports the thesis that the ECJ is not overly critical. [read post]
