Search for: "Matter of Said v Said"
Results 121 - 140
of 30,681
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2012, 7:00 am
Posner in Chicago excluded damages expert witness testimony in Apple v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 5:42 pm
You might remember this was the case that Doug Berman said had definite sleeper potential. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 11:42 am
Today, however, the justices said they will take up an interesting case on local taxation: Armour v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 10:00 pm
The matter of Apple Inc. and NeXT Software Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 12:44 am
GmbH v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 4:30 am
Ultimately the court said no, no, no and remanded the matter finding that removal was not authorized by CAFA. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 12:11 am
(Quoting Gaus v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 4:47 am
Brady v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:30 am
The opinion, Prometheus v. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 7:49 am
***Of the matter of substantive rule-making authority, patentbaristas had brought up the case of Animal Legal Defense Fund v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 10:24 am
All this said, the Kuctha majority is still the majority. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 8:01 pm
., LLC v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 9:57 am
At the national level, also super-learned Mr Justice Arnold said [in his 2013 decision in SAS v WPL, at para 27] that:"In the light of a number of recent judgments of the CJEU, it may be arguable that it is not a fatal objection to a claim that copyright subsists in a particular work that the work is not one of the kinds of work listed in section 1(1)(a) of the Copyright, Designs and Patents 1988 and defined elsewhere in that Act." [read post]
25 Nov 2015, 8:00 am
It does not matter that Plaintiff herself is the one who made the out-of-court statement. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 8:09 am
The Supreme Court heard oral argument yesterday in Lomax v. [read post]
23 Apr 2016, 4:31 am
I posted that clip yesterday and said "the words scarcely matter. [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 3:54 pm
By Dennis Crouch CLS Bank v. [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 12:07 am
It was considered a fairly settled, noncontroversial matter. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 1:16 pm
The trigger this time: in a blockbuster opinion (and I never use that term), the Federal Circuit has overturned a jury verdict finding that Google's use of 37 API headers was fair use and instead said that said reuse could not be fair use as a matter of law. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 6:39 am
In Graham v. [read post]
