Search for: "Matter of Shell Oil Co." Results 121 - 140 of 178
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2011, 9:38 am by Francis Pileggi
The below article first appeared on Aug. 24, 2011, in The Delaware Business Court Insider, here. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 4:30 am
Shell Oil Co., 602 F.3d 1087, 1089 (9th Cir. 2010), the Ninth Circuit held that when a district court has subject matter jurisdiction under CAFA, subsequent denial of class certification does not divest district court jurisdiction. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
Shell Oil Co., 602 F.3d 1087, 1091-92 (9th Cir. 2010), which addressing a similar issue upon a case removed to the federal court under CAFA, held that post-filing developments do not defeat jurisdiction if jurisdiction was properly invoked as of the time of filing. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
Shell Oil Co., 602 F.3d 1087, 1091-92 (9th Cir. 2010), which addressing a similar issue upon a case removed to the federal court under CAFA, held that post-filing developments do not defeat jurisdiction if jurisdiction was properly invoked as of the time of filing. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 5:06 am
To summarise: Jiangsu Weilishi was selling motor oil in China, claiming to be authorised by Beijing Emperor and relying on consumer’s industry knowledge that Beijing Emperor was connected with Beijing Shell to create an impression that Weilishi was connected to Shell. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 4:13 pm
Shell Oil Co., 308 F.3d 1167, 1187 (Fed. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 10:53 pm
Shell Oil Co., 602 F.3d 1087, 1089 (9th Cir.2010), the Ninth Circuit joining with the Seventh Circuit, concluded that “if the putative class action was properly removed to begin with, the subsequent denial of Rule 23 class certification does not divest the district court of jurisdiction. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 7:05 am by Steven Boutwell
Shell Oil Co., 2007 WL 2220986 (S.D.Tex. 2007), the court granted a request for summary judgment since the spar, the URSA was not vessel. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 1:10 pm by Christa Culver
CookeDocket: 10-333Issue(s): Whether a federal court may grant habeas corpus relief to a state prisoner based on its view that the state court erred in applying the state-law standard of evidentiary sufficiency governing state parole decisions.Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (9th Circuit)Petition for certiorariBrief in opposition Petitioners' reply Title: Shell Oil Co. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 1:18 pm by WIMS
BP has been notoriously challenged on matters of process safety. [read post]
2 Sep 2010, 5:30 am
Shell Oil Co., 602 F.3d 1087 (9th Cir. 2010), held that if a defendant properly removed a putative class action at the get-go, a district court’s subsequent denial of class certification does not divest the court of jurisdiction. [read post]