Search for: "Matter of Snowden v Snowden"
Results 121 - 140
of 207
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Oct 2015, 11:10 pm
Or, alternatively, may and/or must the office holder conduct his or her own investigation of the matter in the light of factual developments in the meantime since that Commission Decision was first published? [read post]
7 Oct 2015, 1:33 am
The Court of Justice of the European Union has produced a landmark decision in Maximillian Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner (C‑362/14). [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 5:08 pm
Today’s decision by the European Court of Justice on safe harbor – Maximillian Schrems v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 9:42 am
The European Court of Justice (ECJ) invalidated the Safe Harbor Framework today in Schrems v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 6:12 am
The decision is here: Maximillian Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner. [read post]
3 Oct 2015, 5:34 am
Michael Knapp provided a primer on United States v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
The simplest approach in concept probably would be to remove or override domestic legal prohibitions on disclosure, where desired, in response to certain types of favored foreign production directives.[37] As a matter of U.S. law, this would not be difficult technically (although it might be very challenging politically). [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 4:23 pm
The decision was reviewed before the High Court which found that if the matter were to be determined solely by Irish law, s. 11(2)(a) would end the matter. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 1:17 pm
See United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 7:57 pm
Digital is Different - Metadata Matters Perhaps Mr. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 1:07 pm
” Bartnicki v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 1:07 pm
” Bartnicki v. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 10:11 am
An IDF official clarified the matter in response to a statement Hezbollah that Israel had been assisting Nusra Front members. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:56 am
The plaintiff in that case has argued that, given the NSA/Snowden revelations, the Safe Harbor (upon which Facebook—like many other US-based companies—relies to transfer and hold users’ personal data in the US) could not provide adequate protection as a matter of EU law. [read post]
12 Jun 2015, 4:32 pm
This week’s guest was Dan Kaminsky, a cybersecurity researcher: Wells linked us to the DC Circuit Court of Appeals decision in al Bahlul v. [read post]
25 May 2015, 9:59 am
The court relied on Smith v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 3:55 pm
So what was McConnell saying pre-Snowden? [read post]
9 May 2015, 7:20 pm
NSAACLU v. [read post]
9 May 2015, 6:25 am
On Tuesday, Wells linked to an en banc decision by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 2:23 pm
The ruling in ACLU v. [read post]
