Search for: "Matter of T S B" Results 121 - 140 of 19,484
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2008, 1:17 am
No matter how you feel about the Portland mayor's race, those who groove on R&B, blues, and jazz from the Rose City will want to take note of this campaign benefit for Mr. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 8:18 am by Dave
  At least, I think it is: unfortunately, it’s not clear whether it is a successful proportionality defence, and the circuit judge (who shall remain nameless as a result) also confuses gateway (a) and (b). [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 8:18 am by Dave
  At least, I think it is: unfortunately, it’s not clear whether it is a successful proportionality defence, and the circuit judge (who shall remain nameless as a result) also confuses gateway (a) and (b). [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
(a) In decision T 19/86, a new group of subjects (sero-positive piglets) was vaccinated against the same disease (Aujeszky’s disease) against which vaccination had already been disclosed for sero-negative piglets. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 8:26 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Similar to its Federal Rule of Evidence 606(b), Nebraska Rule of Evidence 27-606(2) provides that Upon an inquiry into the validity of a verdict or indictment, a juror may not testify as to any matter or statement occurring during the... [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 3:01 pm by oliver randl
Irrespective of whether its priority is valid or not, in particular as regards its claim 3 and Example C6, in the board’s view it does not anticipate the subject-matter of claim 1 of this request. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 11:19 am by Jeffrey W. Berkman, Esq.
While this 6th installment of the Ten Legal Mistakes Made by Start Ups examines the "83(b) Election," the underlying theme is the need to engage an accountant who understands your tax profile and a lawyer who understands the accountant.Myth #6:  "I don't need to be concerned with tax issues because this is just a start up. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 5:25 am
To download a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Matter of Chandel B. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 2:38 pm by Eugene Volokh
[Such a requirement violates the First Amendment's protection against compelled speech, the court held, and can't be justified as a regulation of professional conduct.] [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
In the board’s judgement decision T 848/93 […] is for this reason alone not relevant to the present case and cannot be relied on to justify the view that the purpose of the claimed method should be considered a limiting technical feature of claim 1.[9] In a second line of argumentation the appellant submitted that document D3 did not disclose the technical effect of reducing saturated fatty acid levels. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 6:26 am by Kevin Wickliffe
” In addition,”[i]t does not matter whether control is exercised, so long as the power to control exists. [read post]