Search for: "Matter of T S B" Results 121 - 140 of 19,490
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Similarly, "[o]rdinarily, the decision of the [B]oard of [T]rustees as to the cause of an officer's disability will not be disturbed unless its factual findings are not supported by substantial evidence or its final determination and ruling is arbitrary and capricious" (Matter of Singleton v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys., 208 AD3d at 882-883 [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
13 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Similarly, "[o]rdinarily, the decision of the [B]oard of [T]rustees as to the cause of an officer's disability will not be disturbed unless its factual findings are not supported by substantial evidence or its final determination and ruling is arbitrary and capricious" (Matter of Singleton v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys., 208 AD3d at 882-883 [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
10 May 2024, 8:17 am by David Oxenford
Under 21 USC § 843 (b) and (c), to use communications facilities, including radio and the internet, to facilitate any sale of any Federally controlled substance is a felony. [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Under CPLR 7511 (b) an arbitration award must be vacated if, as relevant here, a party's rights were impaired by an arbitrator who 'exceeded [their] power' " (Matter of Kowaleski [New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs.], 16 NY3d 85, 90 [2010], quoting CPLR 7511 [b] [1] [iii]). [read post]
10 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"Under CPLR 7511 (b) an arbitration award must be vacated if, as relevant here, a party's rights were impaired by an arbitrator who 'exceeded [their] power' " (Matter of Kowaleski [New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs.], 16 NY3d 85, 90 [2010], quoting CPLR 7511 [b] [1] [iii]). [read post]
10 May 2024, 5:00 am by Doug Cornelius
” SEC Rule 240.21F-4(b)(4)(iii)(B) provides for this 120-exception for compliance and audit whistleblowers. [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:58 am by Goldfinger Injury Lawyers
Rather, it has to deal with the procedure of getting the case from point “A” to point “B”. [read post]
8 May 2024, 2:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
WHY THE CURRENT FEDERAL EFFORTS WON’T TAKE THE SPOTLIGHT OFF FIDUCIARIES ANYTIME SOON. [read post]
8 May 2024, 12:07 pm by Doug Cornelius
(A) Buy you buddy another margarita(B) Buy some nachos(C) Buy stock in your buddy’s company Steven Masterson chose (C) and that was the wrong answer. [read post]
8 May 2024, 11:18 am by John B. Palley
The episode I listened to had a caller who I don’t think identified which state she was in but, obviously, that matters. [read post]
8 May 2024, 7:45 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
What was missing was an effort to pull together the many strands of our available knowledge about these matters, and to offer a synthesis of its major aspects that was both comprehensive and comprehensible. [read post]
8 May 2024, 7:19 am
(p. 21).Disclaimed matter that is descriptive of a party’s goods is typically less significant or less dominant when comparing marks. [read post]