Search for: "Matter of Zuckerman"
Results 121 - 140
of 173
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2011, 8:45 am
Therefore, Gross will not apply in DOL whistleblower matters. [read post]
17 Jan 2011, 7:49 am
Term 2d Dept. 2011) “On its motion for summary judgment, MVAIC had the burden of establishing, by proof in admissible form, its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see CPLR 3212[b]; Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 [...] [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 8:55 am
There have been relatively few studies of DDoS as an empirical or a policy matter. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 4:36 pm
Zuckerman and FB to me are "so last year. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 7:56 am
Matter of New York Cent. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 5:04 am
What if anything can I add to what Twining, Roberts, and Zuckerman have said and written? [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 8:16 am
Probably still in the habit from the days when Mort Zuckerman, a fierce opponent of the Cuban embargo (so am I) and a staunch Castro apologist (not me), owned The Atlantic. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 3:00 pm
Since then, Judge Cohen has worked tirelessly to ensure that all matters before him are handled with compassion and dedication. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 7:08 am
I also appreciate the contributions of Ann Lugbill, Rebecca Hamburg, Karen Gray and Jason Zuckerman. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 6:22 am
Co., 20 AD3d at 635), we find that these factual issues prevent a determination as to whether plaintiff's conduct was "criminal in nature" as a matter of law. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 3:24 am
"Plaintiff and his mother co-owned two corporations and defendant represented the corporations in various matters. [read post]
24 May 2010, 8:32 am
Co. v Copfer, 48 NY2d 871, 873).Here, Lexington met its prima facie burden of establishing its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law (see Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324; Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562) by submitting, inter alia, an affirmation of an AIGDC attorney who had handled the Eason claim. [read post]
What the Archimedes' Principle and Empty In-Ground Swimming Pools Have to Do With Insurance Coverage
12 May 2010, 11:12 am
Finding that the efficient or dominant cause of the loss of the pool damage was excluded hydrostatic pressure, the Fourth Department held: Defendant met its initial burden on its motion by establishing as a matter of law that the exclusion for damages caused by "pressure or weight of water" upon which defendant relied unambiguously applied to plaintiff's loss, and plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact in opposition (see generally Zuckerman v City of… [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 5:58 am
., 9 NY3d 264, 267), we conclude that defendants established their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by establishing that the policy does not provide coverage for the loss herein (see generally Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562). [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 6:03 am
In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557, 562). [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 6:05 am
The Greatest Trade Ever: The Behind-the-Scenes Story of How John Paulson Defied Wall Street and Made Financial History by Gregory Zuckerman. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 1:26 am
Special thanks to Bill Schreiner of the Zuckerman Spaeder law firm for providing me with a copy of the decision. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 6:35 am
In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557). [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 8:41 pm
Here are recent posts from the microblog: Finding "The Complete Guide to Google Wave" (Trapani/Pash free ebook) to be very helpful - http://completewaveguide.com/ Bruce MacEwen follows-up with "The Great "Laterals" Conversation, Chapter 2" - http://bit.ly/1aryLI Ethan Zuckerman on why we fall for fast news - http://bit.ly/cBmMN Getting started with GTD - short primer podcast from David Allen - http://bit.ly/1UV94q Jane Genova points to NLJ report… [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 2:04 am
., a partner at Shaub, Ahmuty, Citrin & Spratt, write: In discretionary matters, the Appellate Division's scope of review is co-extensive with that of the trial court, and it may exercise its discretion independently. [read post]
