Search for: "May v May" Results 121 - 140 of 203,636
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2024, 11:26 am by Asheesh Agarwal
”[6] In a policy statement from just a few years ago, the FTC agreed that mergers can promote innovation: [I]n dynamic sectors characterized by high R&D costs, firms with broad scale and scope may have unique incentives and capabilities to invest in innovation. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 10:12 am by Stephen Bilkis
It considers the long-term impact of the injuries on the plaintiff’s life, including any ongoing medical treatments, chronic pain, or permanent disabilities that may affect their quality of life. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 9:47 am by Stephen Bilkis
They may reveal the officer’s phone activity just before and after the accident, shedding light on his state of attention and actions leading up to the collision. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:32 am
June 29th marks the one-year anniversary of the landmark Supreme Court decision in Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:32 am
June 29th marks the one-year anniversary of the landmark Supreme Court decision in Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:16 am by Ahilan Arulanantham
And, in the interim, one can be certain that any set of decisions that quickly terminates the immigration status (and employment authorization) of several hundred thousand people would generate massive fear and disruption — which may well be the point. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"In determining what constitutes . . . compensation paid in anticipation of retirement, we must look to the substance of the transaction and not to what the parties may label it" (Matter of Green v Regan, 103 AD2d 878, 878-879 [3d Dept 1984]; see Matter of Smith v DiNapoli, 167 AD3d at 1210; Matter of Chichester v DiNapoli, 108 AD3d 924, 925 [3d Dept 2013]). [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"In determining what constitutes . . . compensation paid in anticipation of retirement, we must look to the substance of the transaction and not to what the parties may label it" (Matter of Green v Regan, 103 AD2d 878, 878-879 [3d Dept 1984]; see Matter of Smith v DiNapoli, 167 AD3d at 1210; Matter of Chichester v DiNapoli, 108 AD3d 924, 925 [3d Dept 2013]). [read post]