Search for: "May v. Exxon Corporation" Results 121 - 140 of 185
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2011, 1:34 pm by John McFarland
" This case is reminiscent of another case recently decided against royalty owners by the Supreme Court, Exxon Corporation v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 11:32 am by brettb
On one side, the Republicans’ side, you have giant mega-corporations – AT&T, Exxon, big-pharma, big-oil, big-insurance you get the picture. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 4:43 am
Payment or settlement of a claim for interim, short-term damages representing less than the full amount of damages to which the claimant ultimately may be entitled shall not preclude recovery by the claimant for damages not reflected in the paid or settled partial claim. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 1:34 pm by Brian Scott
The case of Exxon Corporation v Exxon Insurance Consultants Ltd (1981) 3 All ER 241 is a leading English precedent where copyright was refused for the word Exxon as an original literary work.Exxon argued it enjoyed copyright in the word Exxon having invested time and energy in employing linguists to invent the word, contending that the actual size of the literary work doesn't preclude a work from acquiring copyright protection. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am by Steven M. Taber
– United States Environmental Protection Agency, July 26, 2010 Rhode Island Airport Corporation and its demolition contractors, O.R. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 12:47 am by Kevin
On the other hand, that may just be what they want you to think. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 3:30 am by Kevin
On the other hand, that may just be what they want you to think. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm by Anthony J. Vecchio
A map or true copy of a map depicting the location and boundaries of the area on or within 1,000 feet of any property used for school purposes which is owned by or leased to any elementary or secondary school or school board produced pursuant to section 1 of P.L.1987, c.101 (C.2C:35-7) may be used in a prosecution under subparagraph (a) of paragraph (3) of this section. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 6:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
On May 11, Whitehouse introduced the Big Oil Polluter Pays Act to overturn the 2008 Supreme Court decision in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 6:19 am by James Bickford
Several senators are considering legislation that would overturn the 1:1 ratio of punitive to compensatory damages established in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 5:41 pm
Cir. 2003); Exxon Research & Eng'g Co. v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:11 am by Marvin Ammori
Pro-BP and pro-Exxon messages might overwhelm the airwaves and newspapers while the actual support for BP's and Exxon's messages is low. [read post]